From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25390 invoked from network); 14 Dec 1999 15:49:05 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Dec 1999 15:49:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 6042 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 1999 15:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2780 Received: (qmail 6035 invoked from network); 14 Dec 1999 15:48:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:48:44 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199912141548.QAA04043@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Andy Spiegl's message of Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:17:55 +0100 Subject: Re: two completion questions Andy Spiegl wrote: > > compctl -D -f + -g .. -S / -q > Hm, I tried that before I saw Sven's patch, but it doesn't change anything. > Probably because I am using the new function-based completion. Is compctl > useless in that case? Or can the two methods be combined? They can, see the file `Base/_default'. BUT: you don't want to do that. It's naughty. Only there for people who already have lots of compctls and want to be able to use them when moving to the new completion system. At least, that's how it's intended to be used ;-) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de