From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-9087-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 27820 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2005 11:39:27 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jul 2005 11:39:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 72900 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2005 11:39:20 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Jul 2005 11:39:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 28427 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2005 11:39:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9087
Received: (qmail 28417 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2005 11:39:14 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Jul 2005 11:39:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 72008 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2005 11:39:14 -0000
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Jul 2005 11:39:08 -0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dra92-0006JO-7U
	for zsh-users@sunsite.dk; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:38:48 +0200
Received: from 212.17.39.109 ([212.17.39.109])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:38:48 +0200
Received: from thorsten by 212.17.39.109 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:38:48 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk
From:  Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de>
Subject:  Re: Asking ZSH: How are you ?
Date:  Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:38:30 +0100
Message-ID:  <1m18uif1pp5e5$.nnwjpdzchmqu$.dlg@40tude.net>
References:  <20050709.165213.74740823.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> <20050709151736.GA382@DervishD> <m6b6fm1b79y7.13jinvogu8q6.dlg@40tude.net> <20050710071800.GA583@DervishD>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.17.39.109
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_BY_IP,
	RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Hits: -1.3

* DervishD (2005-07-10 08:18 +0100)
>  * Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> dixit:
>>>     for option in ${(ko)options}; print ${(r:21:}option $options[$option]
>> Isn't that a bit "too much"?
>> 
>> "autoload -U allopt; allopt" or "set -o" shows you all options and
>> there state.
> 
>     Have you looked at the code for 'allopt'? I think that *that* is
> too much ;)

Maybe for the one who wrote it but not for the one who uses allopt.

"allopt" was the way to go before "set -o" was introduced recently.
Before that you had to do "setopt kshoptionprint; setopt; unsetopt"
which of course in a way was inaccurate because "kshoptionprint" was
modified.

T.