From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15730 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 11:07:27 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Apr 2000 11:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 20232 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2000 11:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3042 Received: (qmail 20219 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 11:06:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:05:44 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004271105.NAA14323@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:11:58 +0400 Subject: Re: Q about new completion (how to create several match sets) Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > This goes to zsh-users as it may be of common interest. Bear in mind, > this refers to the current 3.1.6 version from CVS. 3.1.7-pre-1, more precisely. > In current form _configure completes both --with-option > and --without-option in one shot. It means, that I always get at least > two matches and (in my settings) cursor is placed after --with so I have > to use additional keystroke to jump to the end of line. Hm, this is ugly, but should it be enough to keep from supplying match specs? > Is it possible to _externally_ (without changing _configure and/or > _arguments, but with styles) configure completion system so, that I get > two set of matches - first all --with-* and then all --without-* and can > select either of them? This includes of course different status lines > etc. Sure: zstyle ':completion:*:*:configure:*' tag-order \ 'options:-with:with\ options options:-other:other\ options' \ 'options:-without:without\ options' zstyle ':completion:*:options-with' ignored-patterns '^--with-*' zstyle ':completion:*:options-without' ignored-patterns '^--without-*' zstyle ':completion:*:options-other' ignored-patterns '--with(|out)-*' (Hmmmmm, tag labels. ;-) This says to first complete options two times, once using the tag `options-with' and once using the tag `options-other'. The ignored-patterns for these tags then make sure that you don't get the `--without-*' options. The second value of the tag-order style says to complete options using the tag `options-without' and there the ignored-patterns says that only the `--without-*' options are to be completed. Actually, this is why we invented tag labels. I'm not completely sure that I know what you mean by `select either of them', but of course completing after `--without-' will take the matches from the second set because in the first one nothing matches, and then there is _next_tags, bound to ^Xn to go to the next set of tags in the tag-order style. And for all of this and more and just to rub it in: have a look at Peter's Guide, really good reading. > Is it possible to set different completers for one command only? No. I once asked if we should take the code that sets up the command field of the context from _normal and put it into _main_complete. I even once wrote that, there was a problem which I can't remember now, but finally it worked, so I guess it would still be possible. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de