From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1114 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2000 09:21:38 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jun 2000 09:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 11704 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2000 09:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3115 Received: (qmail 11696 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2000 09:21:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:20:43 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006060920.LAA08319@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 6 Jun 2000 03:20:38 +0000 Subject: Re: blah*[TAB] (difference between 3.1.6 and 3.1.9) Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jun 6, 3:07am, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > } Subject: blah*[TAB] (difference between 3.1.6 and 3.1.9) > } > } Consider a directory where there are two files blah1 and blah2. With > } zsh 3.1.6, when I typed blah* followed by a tab, "blah1 blah2 " was > } generated (with a space after blah2). With zsh 3.1.9, "blah1 blah2" > } is generated (with *no* space after blah2). > } > } How can I have the old behavior (much more logical IMHO)? > > Something's definitely gone wrong with expand-or-complete. This was not > intentional. Ahem. Changed in 9777 in reply to 9756 (guess the author). 9777 commented out some stuff in doexpansion(). Change it back? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de