From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-3341-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 12728 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2000 12:42:32 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Jul 2000 12:42:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 9921 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2000 12:42:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 3341
Received: (qmail 9914 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2000 12:42:08 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:42:05 +0200
From: Matthias Kopfermann <kopfermann@trio-hittfeld.de>
To: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: how can one let completion work *inside* zsh scripts?
Message-ID: <20000727144205.A8559@linux-ws.kg-hittfeld.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 02:00:11PM +0200

> To zsh-workers (and everyone else interested): hm, is this becoming
> FAQish enough to make is simplify it? For example we could allow
> compcontext to be set to `foo()' to make it just call function
> `foo'. And we could allow it to be set to an array and then make
> completion offer its elements as possible completions.
I am for it ! The easier the better. At least normally I
tend to think that way.

Matthias