* Re: Job Table
@ 2001-02-20 10:04 Sven Wischnowsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sven Wischnowsky @ 2001-02-20 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-users
Nick Cross wrote:
> I'm running 3.1.9 and keep getting job table full messages - how do I
> increase the limit?
Change the setting of MAXJOB in config.h or re-configure using
--enable-max-jobtable-size=<number> (and then re-build the shell).
Hm, do you really need more than 48 jobs? (The default for MAXJOB is
50, two of them are used internally.)
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* completion with globbing, take 2 @ 2000-09-17 17:50 E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-17 18:43 ` Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-17 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-users Several days ago, I wanted to know how I could get zsh to respond to something *TAB by replacing the * with the list everything that the completion system would return instead of everything * would match in the current directory. I was told to do this: zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _match bindkey "^I" complete-word I've spent a lot of time trying to figure this out, but this still doesn't work and I don't know how to make it work. This gives a behavior like menu-complete. I never want menu-complete-like functionality. I want behavior more like what expand-or-complete does except that I want only what the completion system would return to be substituted. I will be very explicit to reduce the chance of my question being misunderstood. zsh -f > zsh% autoload -U compinit > zsh% compinit > zsh% mkdir /tmp/z > zsh% cd /tmp/z > zsh% mkdir 1 2 3 > zsh% touch a b c Type: > zsh% rmdir TAB You see: > zsh% rmdir > 1/ 2/ 3/ Type: > zsh% rmdir *TAB You see: > zsh% rmdir 1 2 3 a b c Now configure as above: > zsh% zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _match > zsh% bindkey "^I" complete-word Type: > zsh% rmdir *TAB You see: > zsh% rmdir 1/ 1/ 2/ 3/ Each subsequent TAB rotates between 1/, 2/, and 3/. What I want: > zsh% rmdir *TAB should yield > zsh% rmdir 1 2 3 Is there a way to do this? -- E. Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) | http://www.ql.org/q/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-17 17:50 completion with globbing, take 2 E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-17 18:43 ` Bart Schaefer 2000-09-17 23:03 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-17 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: E. Jay Berkenbilt, zsh-users On Sep 17, 1:50pm, E. Jay Berkenbilt wrote: } } Several days ago, I wanted to know how I could get zsh to respond to } } something *TAB } } by replacing the * with the list everything that the completion system } would return instead of everything * would match in the current } directory. I was told to do this: } } zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _match } bindkey "^I" complete-word More precisely, you were told that Andrej does that. Andrej probably wasn't expecting you to use it verbatim, though, because he didn't show you what his settings for the matcher-list style are. You didn't say whether you have any settings for matcher-list; if you don't, the _match completer won't do anything. } I want behavior more like what expand-or-complete does except that I } want only what the completion system would return to be substituted. That's what the _expand completer is for. I believe you want: zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _expand _complete _match zstyle ':completion::expand:*' completions true And maybe you don't even need the _match on the end, if you haven't worked out any matcher-list values yet. The _match completer is for doing things like case-insensitive completion and completion of sub- parts of file names (e.g., completing on both sides of a "."). You probably also want to read about the following styles: accept-exact add-space completions glob keep-prefix sort subst-globs-only substitute suffix -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-17 18:43 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-17 23:03 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-18 0:17 ` completion and globbing, part 2 E. Jay Berkenbilt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-17 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: schaefer; +Cc: zsh-users Okay, with everyone's help, my problem is solved, but the solution brings up lots of questions. > } Several days ago, I wanted to know how I could get zsh to respond to > } > } something *TAB > } > } by replacing the * with the list everything that the completion system > } would return instead of everything * would match in the current > } directory. I was told to do this: > } > } zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _match > } bindkey "^I" complete-word > > More precisely, you were told that Andrej does that. > > Andrej probably wasn't expecting you to use it verbatim, though, because > he didn't show you what his settings for the matcher-list style are. Right. > You > didn't say whether you have any settings for matcher-list; if you don't, > the _match completer won't do anything. Sorry -- my original message failed to say that I was starting with zsh -f with only the completion system loaded and no additional customization. This is why I was much more explicit in my second message. Also, after reading the code, I don't believe it is true that _match won't do anything without matcher-list set -- see analysis and questions below. > } I want behavior more like what expand-or-complete does except that I > } want only what the completion system would return to be substituted. > > That's what the _expand completer is for. I believe you want: > > zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _expand _complete _match > zstyle ':completion::expand:*' completions true This almost worked, and it gave me enough additional information to get the rest of the way there. I now have the following: zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _expand _match zstyle ':completion::expand:*' completions true bindkey "^I" complete-word This seems to do exactly what I'm looking for. We'll see whether I've broken anything. Removing any of _complete, _expand, or _match or changing the order in which they appear breaks things. Now I've analyzed the code and think I understand why this works, but I'm not 100% certain. Interestingly, ^X? doesn't work when I do rmdir *^X? but that's okay -- I just did setopt xtrace and then rmdir *TAB Again, I have just 1, 2, 3, a, b, and c in the currently directory where 1, 2, and 3 are directories and a, b, and c are files. Looking at the trace and the code, here's what I think is happening: _main_complete is called. It looks up my completers (_oldlist, _complete, _expand, and _match) and calls then in order. _oldlist returns nothing, _complete returns nothing (since no files start with '*'). Now it starts getting interesting. _expand is called. Since I have set the completions style for expand to true, it sets compstate[insert]=all which gives me the behavior I'm looking for with respect to the replacement. However, since the current context is not expand-word:*, it does not call _complete and thus just returns 1. Finally, _match is called. I don't follow exactly what's going on at the top of _match, but it doesn't matter. Since I don't have match-original set, _match sets compstate[pattern_match]='*' and calls _complete again. This time, since compstate[pattern_match] is set, _complete actually does find matches. So the right thing happens, but the path to the desired end seems quite convoluted and counterintuitive to me. I would never have figured this out without the significant hints without having to spend a lot of time grokking this code. So there end up being two important commands here. Without this one: zstyle ':completion::expand:*' completions true the call to _expand doesn't set compstate[insert]=all. Now if I look at this: zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _expand _match If we remove _match, then _complete never gets called again with compstate[pattern_match]='*', so it is essential. If _expand appears before _complete, then rmdir TAB by itself inserts all the matches. So, in summary, it seems that the only thing I'm using expand for is to get compstate[insert]=all. The only thing I'm using _match for is to get _complete to be called with with compstate[pattern_match]='*'. I can't do this with setopt glob_complete because if I do, then the first call to _complete will generate matches when it is called before the call to _expand, so I'll get the menu behavior instead of what I wanted. If I put _expand before _complete with these settings, I always get all matches substituted (as if I had typed the *), which renders the completion system pretty useless. So, is my analysis correct? Am I getting behavior that was intended here, or have I just stumbled upon a way to do this? I feel like I'm getting the desired behavior through a series of coincidences and that this could change or break pretty easily in the future.... Thanks for all the help. Jay ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* completion and globbing, part 2 @ 2000-09-18 0:17 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-18 6:07 ` completion with globbing, take 2 Andrej Borsenkow 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-18 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-users It occurred to me that if the analysis in my last message was true, the following would work: zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _qcomp _ignored bindkey "^I" complete-word where _qcomp is defined as follows: #autoload compstate[pattern_match]='*' compstate[insert]=all ret=1 _complete && ret=0 return ret This does, in fact, give me exactly the behavior I'm looking for without using _expand or _match. (I also added _ignored, but that doesn't have anything to do with this.) -- E. Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) | http://www.ql.org/q/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-17 18:43 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-18 6:07 ` Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 6:53 ` completion and globbing, part 2 Andrej Borsenkow 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-09-18 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Schaefer, E. Jay Berkenbilt, zsh-users > > More precisely, you were told that Andrej does that. > First, I must apologize for wrong advice (you should not answer such questions at 10pm :-( And I misunderstood the question anyway. > Andrej probably wasn't expecting you to use it verbatim, though, because > he didn't show you what his settings for the matcher-list style are. You > didn't say whether you have any settings for matcher-list; if you don't, > the _match completer won't do anything. > No, wrong. _match has absolutely nothing to do with matcher-list style (that was introduced only recently). _match was first "alternative" for GLOB_COMPLETE option. It tries to match the list of possible completions against pattern on command line. This works for _every_ completion (while GLOB_COMPLETE worked only for files). But _match never tries to *expand* the pattern - that is what _expand is for. matcher-list is used to set global "matchers" - e.g. to do case-insensitive or partial-word completion, like completing c-w to complete-word :-)) or g_c to G_c to globcomplete. > } I want behavior more like what expand-or-complete does except that I > } want only what the completion system would return to be substituted. > Thinking about it, I believe, that _match would be the correct completer to do it. There are many cases where we simply cannot do expansion at all - option names, widget names etc etc etc. So, consider something like setopt *complete*TAB WIth _match this enters menu completion - but _expand_word (I tried it) gives you nothing. So, there seems to be no way to just insert all matching choices. While _expand (and friends) may be useful at times, _match just seems to be more powerful. (Of course, another general solution is to have widget that would insert all listed choices at once. Was not it discussed once?) > That's what the _expand completer is for. I believe you want: > > zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _expand _complete _match > zstyle ':completion::expand:*' completions true > Actually, no. It works in this case only because file completion itself is using globbing - that is, the set of possible matches is determined by pattern on command line. But the original wish was: the * gets replaced with all the choices that the completion system returns at that time (i.e., whatever glob pattern I've typed should be applied to the completion choices rather than to files)? It is exactly what _match does ... without giving you the way to insert all choices. > And maybe you don't even need the _match on the end, if you haven't > worked out any matcher-list values yet. The _match completer is for > doing things like case-insensitive completion and completion of sub- > parts of file names (e.g., completing on both sides of a "."). > No. See above the description of _match. -andrej ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: completion and globbing, part 2 2000-09-18 0:17 ` completion and globbing, part 2 E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-18 6:53 ` Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 9:59 ` insert-all-matches example " Andrej Borsenkow 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-09-18 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: E. Jay Berkenbilt, zsh-users > > > It occurred to me that if the analysis in my last message was true, > the following would work: > > zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _qcomp _ignored > bindkey "^I" complete-word > > where _qcomp is defined as follows: > > #autoload > > compstate[pattern_match]='*' > compstate[insert]=all > ret=1 > _complete && ret=0 > return ret > > This does, in fact, give me exactly the behavior I'm looking for > without using _expand or _match. > > (I also added _ignored, but that doesn't have anything to do with > this.) > In this case, you, probably, do not need _oldlist either. Well, what you've effectively done is to write stripped-down version of _match :-) Could you consider patching _match adding a style to control it? But, really, it may not be as simple. _expand gives you choice to select all expantions as a tag. But _match just modifies behaviour of subsequent completer ... I mean, general implementation should give a choice to insert or not to insert all matching completions. I currently do not see place to put it in. May be, widget to do it (insert all current choices) would be the simplest case. Hmm ... may be it is even possible to implement it as function. -andrej ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* insert-all-matches example RE: completion and globbing, part 2 2000-09-18 6:53 ` completion and globbing, part 2 Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-09-18 9:59 ` Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 17:28 ` completion with globbing, take 2 Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-09-18 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: E. Jay Berkenbilt, zsh-users > > May be, widget to do it (insert all current choices) would be the simplest > case. Hmm ... may be it is even possible to implement it as function. > Very dumb implemetation. It won't work (correctly) if anything is already inserted on command line - that is, it will insert all matches directly after anything already there. This may or may not be appropriate. bor@itsrm2% which _insert_all_matches _insert_all_matches () { compstate[insert]=all compstate[old_list]=keep _complete } bor@itsrm2% zle -C insert-all-matches complete-word _insert_all_matches bor@itsrm2% bindkey '^Xi' insert-all-matches With these you could do: bor@itsrm2% ls f*^D bor@itsrm2% ls f* Completing file fnt/ foo.c Now press ^Xi bor@itsrm2% ls fnt foo.c But, as stated, it has all sorts of problems. It does not work correctly after *completion* - it tries to complete word already inserted (that is, it is treated as new completion instead of continuation of old - but this may be related to my styles settings). ^D is needed to get a list that is inserted with ^Xi. -andrej ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-18 9:59 ` insert-all-matches example " Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-09-18 17:28 ` Bart Schaefer 2000-09-18 22:07 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-18 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-users On Sep 17, 7:03pm, E. Jay Berkenbilt wrote: } } Also, after reading the code, I don't believe it is true that _match } won't do anything without matcher-list set -- see analysis and } questions below. Right, I was confused, as Andrej has already pointed out. (The completion system has a tendency to do that to almost anyone from time to time, even Sven.) } Now I've analyzed the code and think I understand why this works, but } I'm not 100% certain. Interestingly, ^X? doesn't work when I do } } rmdir *^X? I believe _complete_debug actually did work, but _message did not (and therefore you didn't see the "Trace output left in ..." message). If you try it again and then immediately hit C-p (up-line-or-history), you should find that the command to view the trace file has in fact been recorded. } zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _expand _match } } If we remove _match, then _complete never gets called again with } compstate[pattern_match]='*', so it is essential. If _expand appears } before _complete, then } } rmdir TAB } } by itself inserts all the matches. Yes, I was a bit surprised by that myself -- I think it must be a bug. I don't think the _expand completer should do anything when there's no prefix nor a suffix. On Sep 17, 8:17pm, E. Jay Berkenbilt wrote: } Subject: completion and globbing, part 2 } } It occurred to me that if the analysis in my last message was true, } the following would work: [...] } This does, in fact, give me exactly the behavior I'm looking for } without using _expand or _match. Does it? What happens when you complete a pattern that matches only directories? (I get, it inserts all the directories and adds a slash after only the last one, so if I press TAB again I get completions in that last directory, which seems unlikely to be what you'd want.) Incidentally, the three lines ret=1 _complete && ret=0 return ret are equivalent to just _complete return and if _complete is the last line in the function, you don't even need the `return'. On Sep 18, 10:07am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: RE: completion with globbing, take 2 } } [...] consider something like } } setopt *complete*TAB } } WIth _match this enters menu completion - but _expand_word (I tried } it) gives you nothing. So, there seems to be no way to just insert all } matching choices. As Jay discerned, `compstate[pattern_match]=\*' is all you need to get the same effect as _match in this case. The only additional stuff that _match gets you (now that I'm thinking correctly about what it does) is handling of the match-original and insert-unambiguous styles. } While _expand (and friends) may be useful at times, _match just seems to be } more powerful. (Of course, another general solution is to have widget that } would insert all listed choices at once. Was not it discussed once?) Only in the context of _expand, I think, which led to the all-expansions tag. The default behavior of _expand is to insert all the expansions and then enter menu completion (with all the expansions being the first item in the menu) so you can cycle away to just some of them if you prefer. On Sep 18, 10:53am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: RE: completion and globbing, part 2 } } Well, what you've effectively done is to write stripped-down version of } _match :-) Not quite; he's written a stripped-down version of "_expand with the completions style defaulted to true, followed by _match". } Could you consider patching _match adding a style to control it? The most obvious thing would be to have _match itself recognize the completions style. } But _match just modifies behaviour of subsequent completer ... Eh? It *calls* _complete. How is that modifying subsequent completers? On Sep 18, 1:59pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: insert-all-matches example RE: completion and globbing, part 2 } } _insert_all_matches () { } compstate[insert]=all } compstate[old_list]=keep } _complete } } } bor@itsrm2% zle -C insert-all-matches complete-word _insert_all_matches } bor@itsrm2% bindkey '^Xi' insert-all-matches I get: _files:54: no matches found: *:all-files You have to remember to provide the standard completion-system setopts in any wrapper around the supplied completer functions. _insert_all_matches () { setopt localoptions nullglob rcexpandparam extendedglob noshglob unsetopt markdirs globsubst shwordsplit nounset ksharrays compstate[insert]=all compstate[old_list]=keep _complete } (Speaking of which, there's nullglob in the list. Who was it who added (N) to all those glob patterns in several functions?) } But, as stated, it has all sorts of problems. It does not work correctly after } *completion* - it tries to complete word already inserted (that is, it is } treated as new completion instead of continuation of old - but this may be } related to my styles settings). Hmm ... can you give an example of what you see that you think is wrong? It seems OK to me (and I'm curious which of your styles might botch it). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-18 17:28 ` completion with globbing, take 2 Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-18 22:07 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-19 2:14 ` Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-18 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: schaefer; +Cc: zsh-users > } Also, after reading the code, I don't believe it is true that _match > } won't do anything without matcher-list set -- see analysis and > } questions below. > > Right, I was confused, as Andrej has already pointed out. (The completion > system has a tendency to do that to almost anyone from time to time, even > Sven.) Actually, I'll admit to being heartened to see others getting confused about this. It is pretty confusing. :-) > On Sep 17, 8:17pm, E. Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > } Subject: completion and globbing, part 2 > } > } It occurred to me that if the analysis in my last message was true, > } the following would work: > [...] > } This does, in fact, give me exactly the behavior I'm looking for > } without using _expand or _match. > > Does it? What happens when you complete a pattern that matches only > directories? (I get, it inserts all the directories and adds a slash > after only the last one, so if I press TAB again I get completions in > that last directory, which seems unlikely to be what you'd want.) Well, in fact, I never do this with rmdir. I chose it as an example only because it's easy to work with and has simple completion functions. I really use this with cvs add and cvs rm where it is great. If I create a bunch of test files, I can do cvs add *TAB and automatically not get the files that are already registered or files that are in .cvsignore. A great timesaver. What I used to do is cvs add `cvs -qn update | fgrep '?' | awk '{print $2}'` (or something like that) which isn't tooo bad but is obviously not as nice as cvs add *TAB. :-) > Incidentally, the three lines > > ret=1 > _complete && ret=0 > return ret > > are equivalent to just > > _complete > return > > and if _complete is the last line in the function, you don't even need > the `return'. Nice to know. So I guess zsh functions are like lisp and perl -- the value of the last statement is the return value -- but with the additional feature that return with no arguments returns the last value.... I'll have to play a bit to see what the real rules are or check the documentation. Over time as I gain more experience in more languages and work with more people's code, I find myself philosophically leaning more toward the Python mentality of making everything explicit, but that's another topic for another forum.... -- E. Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) | http://www.ql.org/q/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: completion with globbing, take 2 2000-09-18 22:07 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt @ 2000-09-19 2:14 ` Bart Schaefer 2001-02-20 9:55 ` Job Table Nick Cross 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2000-09-19 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: E. Jay Berkenbilt; +Cc: zsh-users On Sep 18, 6:07pm, E. Jay Berkenbilt wrote: } Subject: Re: completion with globbing, take 2 } } > Does it? What happens when you complete a pattern that matches only } > directories? } } Well, in fact, I never do this with rmdir. [...] } I really use this with cvs add and cvs rm where it is great. So you have it restricted by style to :completion::complete:cvs* or something like that? I could see where that would be useful, but I wouldn't want it in context :completion:* ... I generally do the same thing by using accept-and-menu-complete. Just hit tab once, get the first completion, and then hit ^X TAB until all the files have appeared. That way I can selectively skip any that I don't want to add, rather than inserting them all and then having to back up and delete some. bindkey '^X^I' accept-and-menu-complete } Nice to know. So I guess zsh functions are like lisp and perl -- the } value of the last statement is the return value -- but with the } additional feature that return with no arguments returns the last } value.... That's true of all Bourne-shell-like shells, actually. At least, those that have functions. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Job Table 2000-09-19 2:14 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2001-02-20 9:55 ` Nick Cross 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Nick Cross @ 2001-02-20 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-users Hi, I'm running 3.1.9 and keep getting job table full messages - how do I increase the limit? Cheers, Nick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-20 10:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-02-20 10:04 Job Table Sven Wischnowsky -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2000-09-17 17:50 completion with globbing, take 2 E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-17 18:43 ` Bart Schaefer 2000-09-17 23:03 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-18 0:17 ` completion and globbing, part 2 E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-18 6:07 ` completion with globbing, take 2 Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 6:53 ` completion and globbing, part 2 Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 9:59 ` insert-all-matches example " Andrej Borsenkow 2000-09-18 17:28 ` completion with globbing, take 2 Bart Schaefer 2000-09-18 22:07 ` E. Jay Berkenbilt 2000-09-19 2:14 ` Bart Schaefer 2001-02-20 9:55 ` Job Table Nick Cross
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).