From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2481 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2001 16:35:06 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Sep 2001 16:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 16643 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2001 16:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 4213 Received: (qmail 16627 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2001 16:34:49 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:34:48 +0200 From: Simon Hausmann To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: quick question about '%s' expansion Message-ID: <20010909183448.A25942@master.kde.org> References: <20010908234535.A13658@master.kde.org> <3B9A9379.6000202@mow.siemens.ru> <20010909101739.A15515@master.kde.org> <1010909160001.ZM21646@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1010909160001.ZM21646@candle.brasslantern.com>; from schaefer@brasslantern.com on Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:00:01PM +0000 On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:00:01PM +0000, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Sep 9, 10:17am, Simon Hausmann wrote: > } Subject: Re: quick question about '%s' expansion > } > } Ah, yes, with -f it works. Silly me, I had a preexec which looked like > } > } preexec () {print -Pn "\e]0;%n@%m: $*\a"} > > The definition of preexec changed just before the 4.0 release. Re-read > the manual entry for it. You almost certainly want to use $1 or $2, not > $*, in your xterm title. Whoops, $1 looks much better, indeed. Thanks for your help! Simon