From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-5378-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 17579 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 04:31:40 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 04:31:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 22868 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2002 04:31:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 5378
Received: (qmail 22856 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 04:31:24 -0000
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:31:15 -0400
From: Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org>
To: rik <zsh@rikrose.net>
Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: spam sucks
Message-ID: <20020924043115.GA16363@dman.com>
References: <12154.1032784882@csr.com> <20020923233105.GA12367@spoon.pkl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020923233105.GA12367@spoon.pkl.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)

> SpamAssassin has so far caught the vast majority of them. I have it
> setup to work through procmail, which mailman can also do, and is
> aparently a good idea.

Still, spamassassin tags plenty of false positives, lets actual spam
through, and requires someone to look over its shoulder to resolve the
former problem, at least.