From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19152 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2002 17:59:57 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Nov 2002 17:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17674 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2002 17:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5481 Received: (qmail 17603 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2002 17:58:56 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:57:32 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: viruses (was Re: Meeting notice) Message-ID: <20021101175732.GA26288@dman.com> References: <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B4D1@MOWD019A> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) > Anyone know what `TMDA' stands for? Or `LISA' for that matter? http://tmda.net/ http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa02/ > I'd be in favour of some sort of automated spam filtering such as > spamassassin with the rejected messages going to some address which a > human can periodically check through and resend any false positives on > from. I can do that unless somebody else is happy to. I think even some MTA-level checks could be benficial; I get ezmlm bounce messages from the zsh lists because sendmail doesn't like the envelope headers of some spam. SpamAssassin is run on the Debian lists, to some positive effect as well. > Are other people blocking yahoo? If so I'll post under a different > address. People take all sorts of draconian measures which result in the loss of legitimate mail.