From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6949 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 13:14:04 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 13:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 17491 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 13:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5800 Received: (qmail 17484 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 13:13:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 13:13:40 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [62.168.44.50] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 13:13:40 -0000 Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by mail.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDAE69 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:13:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3CAC92FDC71; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:13:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:13:42 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: 'zsh users' Subject: Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@ Message-ID: <20030122131342.GO86853@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: 'zsh users' References: <15917.34532.553820.426917@cns-build2.cisco.com> <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B5F3@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B5F3@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i # Andrey.Borzenkov@siemens.com / 2003-01-22 09:28:35 +0300: > > >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Stephenson writes: > > > > Peter> There's no-one here but us chickens. This sounds OK by me, > > Peter> are there any violent objections? > > > > Peter> Oliver tends to deal with a lot of the Sunsite-related > > Peter> stuff... do you want to decide finally about this, Oliver? > > > > How about require a zsh specific header like: > > > > X-zsh: .... > > > > Non X-zsh email will be bounced with a warning message. > > > > Advantage: > > * no need for confirmation wait > > * reduce network traffic > > > > DisAdvantage: > > * add this header when posting > > I personally say "no" unless you explain how to add custom headers to mail > sent to specific address only in Outlook. Just say "no" (to Outlook)! seriously though: how many people on the list use zsh on Windows? but this is all void: it's job of the server software to take care of the users -> workers forwarding, and posters should not be forced to do anything special about it. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html