From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20641 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 09:10:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 09:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 18199 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 09:09:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5928 Received: (qmail 18191 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 09:09:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 09:09:17 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [81.5.149.242] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 9:9:16 -0000 Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18lQEA-0000FC-00; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:09:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:09:18 +0000 To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Please remove this spamming asshole Message-ID: <20030219090918.GA585@fysh.org> References: <20030215183407.55965.qmail@web13707.mail.yahoo.com> <6269.1045642878@finches.logica.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6269.1045642878@finches.logica.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Zefram Oliver Kiddle wrote: >The spams getting through seem to be mostly just those with charsets of >euc-kr, ks_c_5601-1987 and GB2312 and content-types of text/html. I can only think of one occasion when I've received a non-spam email with content type text/html -- that alone is a good spam indicator. There's also a huge number of people that have the poor taste to send a multipart of text/plain and text/html, which also deserves to be discouraged but isn't a good spam indicator. -zefram