From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-6819-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 19597 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 18:57:54 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 18:57:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 19140 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2003 18:57:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 6819
Received: (qmail 19100 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 18:57:36 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 18:57:36 -0000
X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk)
Received: from [66.93.131.57] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 18:57:35 -0000
Received: from lorien.emufarm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lorien.emufarm.org (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id hAUIur1t026992;
	Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:56:53 -0800
Received: (from duvall@localhost)
	by lorien.emufarm.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id hAUIuq3b026991;
	Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:56:52 -0800
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:56:52 -0800
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@emufarm.org>
To: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
Cc: Jens Petersen <petersen@redhat.com>, Zsh-users <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: problem building zsh in background
Message-ID: <20031130185652.GA26891@lorien.emufarm.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall <duvall@emufarm.org>,
	Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>, Jens Petersen <petersen@redhat.com>,
	Zsh-users <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>
References: <m3d6bgq2tk.wl%petersen@redhat.com> <87d6bgrxml.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <m3vfp7o6c8.wl%petersen@redhat.com> <877k1ngcp5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <m365h68uk6.wl%petersen@redhat.com> <m3y8u26r3t.wl%petersen@redhat.com> <87zneewgvd.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zneewgvd.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:43:50PM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:

> Why do you want to run configure with nohup?

In my case, it's more likely that I'd want to run configure from a cron
script -- nightly builds.

> I guess I could run the test in a separate, created pty, but that is
> going to be messy to do portably in configure.

Maybe a configure flag that forces tcsetpgrp() to be recognized as
working, and skip the test?  I know that it works properly on my
platform, so I could use the flag and not worry about whether the build
will hang or abort because of the test ...

Danek