From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13494 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2004 17:49:33 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 17:49:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 3303 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 17:49:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7243 Received: (qmail 16193 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2004 17:42:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 17:42:35 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 17:42:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14709 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2004 17:42:35 -0000 Received: from ip-64-139-3-117.dsl.sca.megapath.net (HELO bang.bigasterisk.com) (64.139.3.117) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 17:42:30 -0000 Received: from dot.bigasterisk.com (IDENT:501@dot [10.1.0.227]) by bang.bigasterisk.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2NHgPQS002360; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:42:25 -0800 Message-Id: <200403231742.i2NHgPQS002360@bang.bigasterisk.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Lloyd Zusman cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk, drewp@bang.bigasterisk.com Subject: Re: Using zftp with a non-standard port In-Reply-To: Message from Lloyd Zusman of "Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:06:26 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:42:25 -0800 From: Drew Perttula X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.0 > > Lloyd Zusman wrote: > Well, instead of an option, how about an optional port appended to > the host after a colon. If so, then either of the two following > items could work: > > host > host:port > > I could come up with a suitable patch for implementing this capability, > if anyone is interested. > I'm interested, and I don't care if it's host:port or some other method. I would eagerly use zftp to get files in and out of my zope servers. It seems like zfopen already takes an option (although it has tricky semantics). If the port choice were going to become an option, I'd obviously like -p which I know from scp/ncftp.