From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17561 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 13:31:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 13:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12689 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2004 13:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7379 Received: (qmail 12641 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 13:29:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 13:29:30 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 13:29:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 5072 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 13:29:29 -0000 Received: from madrid10.amenworld.com (62.193.203.32) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 13:29:27 -0000 Received: from DervishD.pleyades.net (212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net [80.35.44.212]) by madrid10.amenworld.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3LDTJJ22650; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:29:19 +0200 Received: from raul@pleyades.net by DervishD.pleyades.net with local (Exim MTA 2.05) id <1BGF3G-0007Qe-00>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:33:58 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:33:58 +0200 From: DervishD To: Thorsten Kampe Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Proprositions for a useful categorization of zsh options? Message-ID: <20040421103358.GA28557@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Thorsten Kampe , zsh-users@sunsite.dk References: <1o5vc7hkd82ad.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1o5vc7hkd82ad.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Pleyades X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.0 Hi Thorsten :) * Thorsten Kampe dixit: > I am trying to categorize the current 141 zsh options for obvious > reasons. That's cool and VERY useful :) > # COMPLETION [...] > # ambigious completions [...] > # displaying completions [...] Personally I would remove the last two ones. IMHO is enough with 'COMPLETION' category. > # HISTORY [...] > cshjunkiehistory I would put this one in the COMPATIBILITY category. It is for csh junkies, no? > # MISCELLANEOUS Surely this one can be categorized itself. Some suggestions: > autocd > autonamedirs > cdablevars I would change the name POPD/PUSHD of the last category to simply 'DIRS' and put those three there. A couple more could be moved to that 'DIRS' category. In addition to this, a whole bunch of options present in 'MISCELLANEOUS' category could be moved to another category, meaning 'options related to zsh internals', although that would be very ambiguous :(( Now the misc category is simply too big and almost renders the categorization useless :( Anyway, it's a pretty good work! :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/