From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20017 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 19:01:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:01:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 6487 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2004 19:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7385 Received: (qmail 6335 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 19:00:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:00:47 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:0:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10338 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 19:00:46 -0000 Received: from madrid10.amenworld.com (62.193.203.32) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:00:45 -0000 Received: from DervishD.pleyades.net (212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net [80.35.44.212]) by madrid10.amenworld.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3LJ0W400429; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:00:32 +0200 Received: from raul@pleyades.net by DervishD.pleyades.net with local (Exim MTA 2.05) id <1BGMt9-0007xe-00>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:56:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:56:03 +0200 From: DervishD To: Thorsten Kampe Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Proprositions for a useful categorization of zsh options? Message-ID: <20040421185603.GB30591@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Thorsten Kampe , zsh-users@sunsite.dk References: <1o5vc7hkd82ad.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> <20040421103358.GA28557@DervishD> <5dm0y2dfylqz.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5dm0y2dfylqz.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Pleyades X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.0 Hi Thorsten :) * Thorsten Kampe dixit: > >> autocd autonamedirs cdablevars > > I would change the name POPD/PUSHD of the last category to simply > > 'DIRS' and put those three there. > Yes, "pushd/popd" is too specific compared to the the other ones who > are far more general..., but is "DIRS" the appropriate term? Not at all. I have a gift to choose bad names O:)) > "Dealing somehow with dirs" seems a bit vague to me... You're right. A better name should be added. > > A couple more could be moved to that 'DIRS' category. > For instance? Don't remember right now, I saw a couple. But before that, a proper name and description (and rationale) for the category must be chosen. > > In addition to this, a whole bunch of options present in > > 'MISCELLANEOUS' category could be moved to another category, > > meaning 'options related to zsh internals' > Which options for instance? I don't have your original mail at hand, but I was referring to options like 'errexit'. I'm afraid I cannot explain better what I have in mind, specially in English O:) > > ( Now the misc category is simply too big and almost renders the > > categorization useless :( > My fight continues until the last miscellaneous option is categorised > elsewhere... ;-)! Nice ;)) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/