From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8009 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 22:44:14 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 22:44:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 74576 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 22:44:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 22:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19117 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2004 22:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8284 Received: (qmail 19103 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 22:43:15 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 22:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 73294 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 22:43:15 -0000 Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO binome.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 22:43:14 -0000 Received: by binome.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94D2C3931; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:43:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:43:15 -0800 From: Wayne Davison To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Vim syntax file for zsh Message-ID: <20041209224315.GB27510@blorf.net> References: <20041208134714.GB10098@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <20041208181429.GC10098@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <902B4263-49EA-11D9-A14D-000A95D2C79E@kalama.no-ip.org> <20041209144520.GC9424@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <20041209181813.GF9424@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <20041209182347.GG9424@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <20041209200941.GA27510@blorf.net> <20041209212423.GA21023@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041209212423.GA21023@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:24:23PM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > Well, that [ should be quoted, so I'm not persuaded yet. Sorry, I had not meant that as a syntactically correct line, just a minimum number of characters to trigger the bug. The problem also occurs with a normal foo[0-9]-style string. > Well, just remove the whole line? Ah yes, I apparently tried commenting it out with a # instead of a " and fell back on the kluge of tweaking the "start" string instead. Thanks for the new version, ..wayne..