From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20517 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 09:51:20 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 09:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 78816 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 09:51:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 09:51:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 25610 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 09:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8498 Received: (qmail 25595 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 09:50:44 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 09:50:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 77391 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 09:50:40 -0000 Received: from vinc17.net4.nerim.net (HELO ay.vinc17.org) (62.212.121.106) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 09:50:32 -0000 Received: from lefevre by ay.vinc17.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D0zLj-0000tF-12; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:50:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:50:30 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: History corruption (over NFS) Message-ID: <20050215095030.GD19378@ay.vinc17.org> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk References: <20050210165417.GG30487@ay.vinc17.org> <1050210184111.ZM22490@candle.brasslantern.com> <20050214155630.GB6395@ay.vinc17.org> <1050214162440.ZM6002@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1050214162440.ZM6002@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7-vl-20050209i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.4 On 2005-02-14 16:24:40 +0000, Bart Schaefer wrote: > Try changing from "noac" to an explicit "hard". The nfs(5) man page says: hard If an NFS file operation has a major timeout then report "server not responding" on the console and continue retrying indefinitely. This is the default. Why would this option change anything here? -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA