From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19419 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 11:08:29 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 11:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22531 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 11:08:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 11:08:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1656 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 11:08:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8500 Received: (qmail 1644 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 11:08:06 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 11:08:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21334 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 11:08:03 -0000 Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (HELO viefep20-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.25) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 11:07:59 -0000 Received: from Dingo ([213.47.104.218]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20050215110758.YKV21078.viefep20-int.chello.at@Dingo> for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:07:58 +0100 From: Christian Taylor To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: zmv another zsh gem Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:06:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502151206.39476.cht@chello.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.1 On Tuesday 15 February 2005 09:51, zzapper wrote: > In comp.editors I came across mmv and zmv > [...] > The case changers don't work on Cygwin because WinXP grumbles target & > source filename are the same! Using mv to change the case of a filename doesn't work on any "caseless" file system like vfat, because both filenames refer to the same, existing file. Afaik POSIX compliance demands an error in that case. You'll have to do it in two steps. Christian Taylor