From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14804 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 15:59:45 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 92487 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 15:59:34 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 19693 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 15:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8506 Received: (qmail 19678 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 15:59:24 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 91378 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 15:59:21 -0000 Received: from vinc17.net4.nerim.net (HELO ay.vinc17.org) (62.212.121.106) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:59:13 -0000 Received: from lefevre by ay.vinc17.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D156W-0004MA-Hq; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:59:12 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:59:12 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: zsh on Opteron (Linux) and limit Message-ID: <20050215155912.GN19378@ay.vinc17.org> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk References: <20050215125144.GI19378@ay.vinc17.org> <20050215125815.GA17248@scowler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050215125815.GA17248@scowler.net> X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7-vl-20050209i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.5 On 2005-02-15 07:58:15 -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > I've compiled zsh 4.2.4 on Opteron, but the "limit" builtin doesn't > > work. When called without any argument, it outputs nothing, and a 0 > > exit status. > > Is this a bi-arch or pure64 OS? Which one? pure64, I suppose. How can I tell? FYI: helene:~> uname -a Linux helene 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp #1 SMP Thu Jan 13 16:58:29 EST 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA