From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6477 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 02:27:15 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 02:27:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 8780 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 02:27:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 02:27:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 17169 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2005 02:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8629 Received: (qmail 17151 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 02:27:00 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 02:27:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7839 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 02:27:00 -0000 Received: from web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.201.193) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 02:26:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 73020 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Mar 2005 02:26:54 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=gS7sH2hDDBKtNegyhdXiUZDe8oBAvO2cNgtOvO1Qdr9xmKba78uzShuJWQGuy745nvfoqPer11Gg1KQNlA0JZrgWyJwScK8R/fv5OuwYC3L0/mkAANGm655It/JMPe7NsuJRcPGLPXbAEdDdbzeQLuYezOcxEMoJkpiYLThZkJU= ; Message-ID: <20050322022654.73018.qmail@web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.29.47.153] by web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:26:54 PST Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:26:54 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Falstad Subject: Re: correction To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: 0.1 > This appears to have happened during the Interregnum, er, that is, before > 1997, during the period when both of us were dissociated from zsh, in my > case because I objected to the stated intent of the lead maintainers to > rip out various csh-derived syntax and features. IIRC this was when the > word "junkie" got inserted into all the csh compatibility option names, > in prep for dumping them entirely (which thankfully never happened). I think I put in some of the csh_junkie_* option names. > Anyway, the present correctall behavior you describe already appears in > the oldest copy of 3.0 that I can lay hands on, but is "your way" in 2.4. Oh, correctall, right. For plain old "correct" (for commands only) I suppose the new way makes sense, since unwanted spelling correction can't do much damage. For correctall, it can. I suppose if I had smarter compctls or whatever, I could avoid this problem.