Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> Ah, that’s great!  I’ll try to find some time today to actually write a
> complete _vim completion.

OK, so it’s sad that I can only find spare time at 2 am, but here it is,
a quite complete Vim completion defintion.  There’s a problem with the
+<n> option, though.  I couldn’t figure out a proper way of escaping the
+ that is the options name (just using \+ doesn’t work).  Anyone have
any brilliant ideas on this, or is this a problem with the _arguments
argument-parser?

Anyway, enjoy,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}