From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29645 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 15:15:48 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 15:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 7277 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 15:15:40 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 15:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 21291 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9070 Received: (qmail 21281 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 6267 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0000 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net (213.194.149.146) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 15:15:28 -0000 Received: from 212.red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.35.44.212] helo=localhost) by ns9.hostinglmi.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DrH37-0004Bs-Ni; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 17:15:31 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 17:17:36 +0200 From: DervishD To: Meino Christian Cramer Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Asking ZSH: How are you ? Message-ID: <20050709151736.GA382@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Meino Christian Cramer , zsh-users@sunsite.dk References: <20050709.165213.74740823.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050709.165213.74740823.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sunsite.dk X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 Hi Meino :) * Meino Christian Cramer dixit: > When listing options (*** by `setopt', `unsetopt', `set -o' or > `set +o'***), those turned on by default appear in the list > prefixed with `no'. Hence (unless KSH_OPTION_PRINT is set), > `setopt' shows all options whose settings are changed from the > default. > > but giving "setopt +o" or "setopt -o" > always gives me (even for setopt +o!): > > setopt: string expected after -o Of course it does, it's correct ;) You're mixing 'set +o/-o' with 'setopt' and 'unsetopt'. If you want to list all options use 'setopt', without arguments, or 'set -o'. If you want to show ALL options, no matter if they have their default value or not, use this little snippet (for example): for option in ${(ko)options}; print ${(r:21:}option $options[$option] This will give you the list of all option names followed by its value. I find this easier to understand that the default of prefixing with 'no' and the like. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...