From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-9536-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 1315 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2005 03:20:29 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Oct 2005 03:20:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 62890 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2005 03:20:23 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Oct 2005 03:20:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 10791 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 03:20:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9536
Received: (qmail 10780 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2005 03:20:12 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Oct 2005 03:20:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 61606 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2005 03:20:12 -0000
Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (212.48.140.157)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Oct 2005 03:20:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 7866 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2005 16:00:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cooker.home.net) (arvidjaar@newmail.ru@83.237.208.168)
  by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 20 Oct 2005 16:00:07 -0000
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@newmail.ru>
To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: duplicating functions
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:13:20 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: zzapper <david@tvis.co.uk>
References: <kqoel1ltvbmfqr9jg46tkj2p1gh9b9t6io@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <kqoel1ltvbmfqr9jg46tkj2p1gh9b9t6io@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1913025.VBakjGZQEO";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200510202013.20744.arvidjaar@newmail.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=3.0.4

--nextPart1913025.VBakjGZQEO
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 20 October 2005 13:35, zzapper wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a series of functions defined .zshenv
>
> function g0() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g1() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g2() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g3() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g4() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g5() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g6() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g7() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g8() { gmark $0 $* }
> function g9() { gmark $0 $* }
>
> Where gmark contains the code and $0 is used to determine which original
> function was called
>
> Is there are simpler way of doing this

function g{0..9} { gmark $0 $* }

but I still do not understand what's wrong with calling "gmark gN ..."=20
directly

=2Dandrey

--nextPart1913025.VBakjGZQEO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDV8IgR6LMutpd94wRAk4oAJ4h63ikUUceA1pxk4/N/fMvGWMGZQCfWI9G
nJ/ZAnGAXFaWwj7XHvrKQ3c=
=kvGc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1913025.VBakjGZQEO--