Coloring completions

Coloring completions

[Nikolai Weibull]

Is there any way to get colors in completions for something like files
in a tar archive?  Seeing as how it would be possible to tell if an
entry is a directory or not, it would be nice if it was highlighted like
directories on the filesystem are.  The same goes for files with the
executable bit set.

Thanks.

        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: Coloring completions

[Nikolai Weibull]

Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

> On Monday 21 November 2005 16:18, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> > Is there any way to get colors in completions for something like
> > files in a tar archive?  Seeing as how it would be possible to tell
> > if an entry is a directory or not, it would be nice if it was
> > highlighted like directories on the filesystem are.  The same goes
> > for files with the executable bit set.

> zstyle ':completion:*:default' list-colors ""

That's not what I asked about.

        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: Coloring completions

[DervishD]

    Hi Bart :)

 * Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> dixit:
> >     Why it doesn't happen with executable names (which has an asterisk 
> > added) or other kind of files? I mean, why 'listtypes' doesn't have the 
> > same effect?
> I think it'll become obvious if you re-read the documentation for each of
> those setopts:
> 
> -----
> MARK_DIRS (-8, ksh: -X)
>      Append a trailing `/' to all directory names resulting from
>      filename generation (globbing).
> 
> LIST_TYPES (-X) <D>
>      When listing files that are possible completions, show the type of
>      each file with a trailing identifying mark.
> -----

    OK, now I got it. I assumed that MARK_DIRS worked after
completion listings (I don't know why I related the two options). Now
all makes sense. Thanks a lot, Bart, for all the explanations. I'm
going to get rid of MARK_DIRS right now.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/

Re: Coloring completions

[Bart Schaefer]

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, DervishD wrote:

> > When markdirs is set, the expansion of the glob appends a trailing 
> > slash to the file name, and thus the coloring code no longer 
> > recognizes it
> 
>     Why it doesn't happen with executable names (which has an asterisk 
> added) or other kind of files? I mean, why 'listtypes' doesn't have the 
> same effect?

I think it'll become obvious if you re-read the documentation for each of
those setopts:

-----
MARK_DIRS (-8, ksh: -X)
     Append a trailing `/' to all directory names resulting from
     filename generation (globbing).

LIST_TYPES (-X) <D>
     When listing files that are possible completions, show the type of
     each file with a trailing identifying mark.
-----

Specifically, when you write "compadd -f *" the effect of MARK_DIRS is 
seen on the input (arguments) to compadd, but the effect of LIST_TYPES is 
seen on the output (the completion listing).  So the color matching can 
already be done _before_ LIST_TYPES is applied, but it necessarily must be 
done _after_ MARK_DIRS.

Re: Coloring completions

[DervishD]

    Hi Bart :)

 * Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> dixit:
> >     Hey, that's weird :((( I'm testing again completion and *all*
> > colorable files are colored *except* directories
> unsetopt markdirs

    Oh, my... Thanks, Bart, you're great :)
 
> When markdirs is set, the expansion of the glob appends a trailing slash 
> to the file name, and thus the coloring code no longer recognizes it as
> being a string match for the actual directory name.

    Why it doesn't happen with executable names (which has an
asterisk added) or other kind of files? I mean, why 'listtypes'
doesn't have the same effect?

> (When you're using default completion the file expansion is all done in 
> the internals and markdirs is ignored.)

    But the same is not applicable to 'listtypes'. Doesn't seem that
weird?
 
> You might want to take a look at the value assigned to the _comp_options
> array in compinit, and the subsequent _comp_setup assignment.  One of
> the first things _main_complete does is to eval that setup string.

    Yes, I've took a look at it: very clever and useful :)) Thanks a
lot, Bart, as always :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/

Re: Coloring completions

[Bart Schaefer]

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, DervishD wrote:

>     Hey, that's weird :((( I'm testing again completion and *all*
> colorable files are colored *except* directories

unsetopt markdirs

When markdirs is set, the expansion of the glob appends a trailing slash 
to the file name, and thus the coloring code no longer recognizes it as
being a string match for the actual directory name.

(When you're using default completion the file expansion is all done in 
the internals and markdirs is ignored.)

You might want to take a look at the value assigned to the _comp_options
array in compinit, and the subsequent _comp_setup assignment.  One of
the first things _main_complete does is to eval that setup string.

Re: Coloring completions

[DervishD]

    Hi Bart :)

    Thanks for answering :)

 * Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> dixit:
> >     I'm playing with compsys, and I don't understand what happens
> > with coloring.
> [...]
> > when I hit 'TAB' (which currently is bound to 'expand-or-complete'), the 
> > completions appear colored, and that's ok because I have zsh/complist 
> [...]
> > when I hit '^O', depending on the first word only dirs or all files
> > are listed, but they are listed without coloring.
> I'm not able to reproduce your problem.  I get coloring in both cases.  
> Are you _sure_ zsh/complist is loaded?  Are you sure you have ZLS_COLORS 
> set properly?

    ZLS_COLORS and ZLS_COLOURS are bot set and working (AFAIK...) and
zsh/complist is loaded:

    $ zmodload 
    zsh/compctl
    zsh/complete
    zsh/complist
    zsh/main
    zsh/zle

    Hey, that's weird :((( I'm testing again completion and *all*
colorable files are colored *except* directories :( I mean, if I use
default completion (not my widget and function), directories are
colored, otherwise they aren't, that's the only difference :?

> >     If it is not long, boring or off-topic: could anyone explain me
> > how the shell functions given with compsys do the coloring
> The shell functions in compsys don't do anything magical.  They just read 
> a value from a style and assign that to ZLS_COLORS, then restore the old
> ZLS_COLORS value after finishing.

    OK, that's what I assumed from what I read in _setup,
_main_complete and others. BTW, my ZLS_COLORS parameter is:

no=00:fi=00:di=01;37:ln=01;36:pi=05;33:so=01;35:bd=01;33\
  :cd=01;33:or=01;05;31:ex=01;32:*.tar=01;34:*.tgz=01;34\
  :*.z=01;34:*.Z=01;34:*.gz=01;34:*.bz2=01;34:

    ZLS_COLOURS is exactly the same. If I change the color for the
'di' entry, the default completion shows directories with the
appropriate color, but my widget doesn't, it doesn't color them. The
same if I remove the 'di' entry: the default completion colors them
red, mine doesn't color at all. Known bug in my version?

    Thanks again Bart, you're so kind :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/

Re: Coloring completions

[Bart Schaefer]

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, DervishD wrote:

>     I'm playing with compsys, and I don't understand what happens
> with coloring.
[...]
> when I hit 'TAB' (which currently is bound to 'expand-or-complete'), the 
> completions appear colored, and that's ok because I have zsh/complist 
[...]
> when I hit '^O', depending on the first word only dirs or all files
> are listed, but they are listed without coloring.

I'm not able to reproduce your problem.  I get coloring in both cases.  
Are you _sure_ zsh/complist is loaded?  Are you sure you have ZLS_COLORS 
set properly?

> I thought coloring was automatic as long as zsh/complist was loaded.

It is.

>     If it is not long, boring or off-topic: could anyone explain me
> how the shell functions given with compsys do the coloring

The shell functions in compsys don't do anything magical.  They just read 
a value from a style and assign that to ZLS_COLORS, then restore the old
ZLS_COLORS value after finishing.

Coloring completions

[DervishD]

    Hi all :)

    I'm playing with compsys, and I don't understand what happens
with coloring. I currently don't use the shell functions for
completion, I use compsys but 'naked' (resuming: I don't have any
compinit call in my RC's), and when I hit 'TAB' (which currently is
bound to 'expand-or-complete'), the completions appear colored
, and that's ok because I have zsh/complist loaded. The problem
appears when I do the following:

bindkey "^O" completer
zle -C completer expand-or-complete completer

function completer () {
    if [[ $words[1] == cd ]]
    then
        compadd -f *(/)
    else
        compadd -f *
    fi
}

    That's a stupid test to play with compsys. If I do the above,
when I hit '^O', depending on the first word only dirs or all files
are listed, but they are listed without coloring. I thought coloring
was automatic as long as zsh/complist was loaded. If I do the above
(remember: I don't use the compsys shell functions), do I need to
'color' de completion matches myself?

    If it is not long, boring or off-topic: could anyone explain me
how the shell functions given with compsys do the coloring or what
should I read first to understand how _main_complete et al. do the
coloring? Given that _main_complete is far complex that my crappy
function above ;) the principles should be the same and the
completion matches are generated by compadd calls, so the coloring is
done by some function or by compsys itself, am I wrong?

    Thanks a lot in advance :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/