From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-9935-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 3983 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 17:01:36 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 17:01:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 27417 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 17:01:29 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 17:01:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 5995 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2006 17:01:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9935
Received: (qmail 5980 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 17:01:18 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 17:01:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 26197 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 17:01:18 -0000
Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 17:01:17 -0000
Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A541C2CE5; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:01:17 -0800
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Wataru Kagawa <wkagawa@jota.gsc.riken.go.jp>
Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: problems with multibyte support in dev-4?
Message-ID: <20060218170117.GB18023@dot.blorf.net>
References: <ABF23FC4-6496-4224-9C45-51F8DE9B7878@jota.gsc.riken.go.jp> <20060218164924.GA18023@dot.blorf.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060218164924.GA18023@dot.blorf.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:49:24AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> the only significant difference is that one works on on unmetafied
> strings (the new one) and the other works on metafied strings (the old
> one).

Ack!  That's actually the problem.  The new algorithm is supposed to be
operating on metafied strings.  I'll fix this.

..wayne..