From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20792 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 19:37:24 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 May 2006 19:37:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 68723 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 19:37:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 May 2006 19:37:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28052 invoked by alias); 4 May 2006 19:37:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10216 Received: (qmail 28043 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 19:37:09 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 May 2006 19:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 67602 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 19:37:09 -0000 Received: from dsl-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 May 2006 19:37:07 -0000 Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF18539C7; Thu, 4 May 2006 12:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:37:05 -0700 From: Wayne Davison To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: web pages Message-ID: <20060504193705.GB2258@dot.blorf.net> References: <20060504164445.50863.qmail@web25406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060504164445.50863.qmail@web25406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > The sf.net web pages seem to have got ahead of sunsite.dk. I mentioned my update back on March 25th in a message entitled "Updating the zsh.sourceforge.net website". In it I asked if I was doing the right thing or not, and got no negative responses. Apparently I failed to read the pretty obvious trailing section that talked about sunsite and gave an address for the website maintainers (ouch). > The ones on sunsite.dk are supposed to be the master and are handled > by cvs while the sf.net ones are handled by using rsync. Since the pages have gotten pretty far out of date, perhaps it would be better to have the pages on SF become the master pages so that anyone on the zsh project can edit them? Or perhaps some kind of a wiki system should be put in place? What do people think? > I'm currently without internet access that doesn't block ssh at the > firewall so can't fix it myself. It would be good if the updates made to the SF pages could be propagated to the sunsite pages somehow -- who can do this? ..wayne..