From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15356 invoked by alias); 30 May 2010 18:10:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 15085 Received: (qmail 17632 invoked from network); 30 May 2010 18:10:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ntlworld.com designates 81.103.221.48 as permitted sender) Message-Id: <201005301809.o4UI9a0j003236@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: accept-exact-dirs needs accept-exact to be set to true? In-Reply-To: Message from Gowtham M of "Sun, 30 May 2010 21:21:13 +0530." Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 19:09:36 +0100 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ZtHxNT4mZm3rCuM0SmWmgWxeBwJsziC8EqOrwwVkrhA= c=1 sm=0 a=U_ZyLzTyE3kA:10 a=UBIxAjGgU1YA:10 a=DogomfpGjd0A:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=ES3AmAJeBT9aSQPO6pkA:9 a=e1V3mE5hmi5Bi1FS8N5PVLrT-J0A:4 a=_dQi-Dcv4p4A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Gowtham M wrote: > However, it appears that accept-exact should be true for accept-exact-dirs > to work. No, they're unrelated. They're not actually handled together: the latter is handled in shell code by looping over prefixes of the directory where you're completing, the latter in the special compfiles builtin. All that should be invisible to you, the point is there is no direct linkage between them. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/