From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-17047-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10289 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2012 18:51:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 17047
Received: (qmail 2945 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2012 18:51:10 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: neutral (ns1.primenet.com.au: 74.125.82.43 is neither permitted nor denied by SPF record at ntlworld.com)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-proxyuser-ip:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
         :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=wD2x2IzS7m48VZrnmo6wwgB5ZM+t63q3W6C0khX//9Q=;
        b=TYwpWCHFPvDdl2n+E5INjA4RteXFupAF7QJ5OCr63B1uiqO+Z7gGC3mAtDzCBsakyQ
         tXq9KWRm7zbuemALo4ZpLyZTXRqCD0KRVZIv0tioB8Y/cVa7qpP0vkDzrciN3sMsYgRv
         4ZlNCFLLFOr/4nr8shajGNJzaAxy4aReJxQzTOHqOnz91DlaNVmYsvtfYEBnw3jWmpjK
         pViUmEzYL8TPZRiyjHCtL4zdt6joq+CFKBShRoKfEtx4jX+Bz4NF9ifIEIE+aOZr6TBy
         UdpJgbFs63zt2FrDlLiEKI8/IMFV4SeHU+Wxv2Qbh9d2Y+uoGSGF4oi5pnVLcnElekRI
         Lajg==
X-ProxyUser-IP: 86.6.29.42
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:22:26 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: ${(s::)VAR} vs "${(s::)VAR}"
Message-ID: <20120429192226.7701b9cf@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <120427195048.ZM10479@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <CAFvQaj4rz82ByYJGhWBG-pZzZuJk4myGBsuSvj_PF64_HCfu1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120427213837.1b861851@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<120427195048.ZM10479@torch.brasslantern.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKqXboS7wl2/UzwG9SAwiXya+TKG7rVwxDM0UkdftyY97s21k5SQgZVxpj9+/m3bFldi3t

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:50:48 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> }  	for (; (c = findsep(&s, sep, 0)) >= 0; s += sl)
> } -	    if ((c && *(s + sl)) || mul)
> } +	    if ((c || mul) && *(s + sl))
> }  		r++;
> 
> Does it matter that the changed line dereferences s+sl in cases where
> the original line does not?

That's true only if c is 0 and mul is 1 (before c had to be 1).	 c is 0
if we're already at a separator, so I think dereferencing s+sl is still
OK.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/