From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28244 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 11:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 17257 Received: (qmail 19064 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2012 11:45:54 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sym2.noone.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:45:49 +0200 From: Axel Beckert To: zsh-users@zsh.org Cc: pkg-zsh-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, clint@debian.org Subject: zsh-beta vs zsh Debian package (was: Re: Zsh on Debian [...]) Message-ID: <20120911114548.GF5515@sym.noone.org> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-users@zsh.org, pkg-zsh-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, clint@debian.org References: <20120909131050.15057aa6@internecto.net> <20120909175104.GV30122@sym.noone.org> <20120909203808.7c627d0c@internecto.net> <20120910001601.GW30122@sym.noone.org> <504E0058.8010802@eastlink.ca> <20120910184214.GB5515@sym.noone.org> <20120911001540.GJ16413@xvii.vinc17.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120911001540.GJ16413@xvii.vinc17.org> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 X-Machine: sym2 x86_64 X-Editor: GNU Emacs 23.2.1 Face: 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 Organization: DeuxChevaux.org -- The =?iso-8859-1?Q?Citr?= =?iso-8859-1?B?b+tu?= 2CV Database User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Hi, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:15:40AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-09-10 20:42:15 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > There are three full distributions in Debian: stable, testing and > > unstable. (For better overview I ignore oldstable and experimental.) > > I wouldn't even say the experimental is a distribution; it's more a > set of packages. Yes, it's an add-on to Unstable (or Testing) without propagating the packages elsewhere (except maybe to Ubuntu ;-), nothing more. That's why I ignored it as mentioned above. :-) > For zsh, there are zsh and zsh-beta, but I don't really see the point > of having both in stable (this may have been interesting in the past, > but it seems that in the past few years, zsh has evolved slowly enough > so that only one version would be needed in stable). I agree. > So, how about removing zsh-beta from testing (hoping that it is not > too late) and make it no longer affected by freezes? Cc'ing the Debian Zsh Packaging Team and Clint for comments as Clint currently maintains the zsh-beta package. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe@deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | abe@noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)