From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-18124-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 22039 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2013 07:16:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 18124
Received: (qmail 25101 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2013 07:16:31 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spodhuis.org; s=d201210;
	h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=tmRpYoyh4VW3d/+HYNmdY3zvM5wtmQK/IA0y7JRokFs=;
	b=tatPxS34dykjpkK+s8Yp/tv24M6nDWkwLYwZg4FClJdLm3lv3+TtnDNYHRo7NcLzwcgFUDzbQa0Tyt0nyGe+qpyAclkQ95xMvpv0oLIFYGkDz9VSufEmPBsy6kF8e2N15Ora2E82MnbzZerzZJF67vvYCuy9e3er28yJ/jxOr40=;
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 02:16:27 -0500
From: Phil Pennock <zsh-workers+phil.pennock@spodhuis.org>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.2-test-1 is available
Message-ID: <20131108071627.GA6216@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>,
	zsh-users@zsh.org
References: <20131106202321.4a48c77b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <20131107153315.GW3544@sym.noone.org>
 <20131107160551.7aa195dc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20131107191806.GA85153@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
 <131107173627.ZM24325@torch.brasslantern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <131107173627.ZM24325@torch.brasslantern.com>
OpenPGP: url=https://www.security.spodhuis.org/PGP/keys/0x3903637F.asc

On 2013-11-07 at 17:36 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> So I don't know why you weren't getting the error message before, but
> it's not a code regression.

I apologise, I've tracked it down.  Depending upon the age of a cache
file, zstat might be called at shell startup time.  So it was a race,
which I lost when I tested in 5.0.2-test-1.

In zsh, you can call `zmodload -a zsh/stat zstat` repeatedly without an
error, up until you call `zstat`.  Once `zstat` has been invoked, future
calls to `zmodload -a zsh/stat zstat` will spew an error and return 1.

Unchanged from 5.0.2.