From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13053 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2014 08:57:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 18698 Received: (qmail 81 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2014 08:57:17 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc96d000004885-2a-533e718da639 Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 09:47:08 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh (stty speed) question or tmux question? Message-id: <20140404094708.6793bd14@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20140404041309.GA1177@panix.com> References: <20140403040534.GA22033@panix.com> <20140404041309.GA1177@panix.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Vd3eQrtgg7ZtWhY7Tq5kdGD0WHXw A1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxoTZhQUn2Sq+X1/N1MA4jbWLkZNDQsBE4suLC8wQtpjEhXvr 2boYuTiEBJYySjyY85gJymGSOHZ+FhtIFYuAqsTlSS8ZQWw2AUOJqZtmg9kiAqISy1dsZgex hQUsJC7MPgY0lYODV8BeYuNpf5Awp4CexIXeo2CLhQQCJFb8bQBr5RfQl7j69xMTxBH2EjOv nAGL8woISvyYfI8FxGYW0JLYvK2JFcKWl9i85i3zBEaBWUjKZiEpm4WkbAEj8ypG0dTS5ILi pPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkAD8uoNx6TGrQ4wCHIxKPLwc6bbBQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4 +wLtgoV4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw6jdvF66rUtnMMr9cpLaiPXDrwpMdr2VuH1pU zmOQ1dZy9Nat2OVyn24frL4UztTVMP0b052nlUuOcpW8aM1+MYe57xv33gdBF5V9fETS/t1X njxXIKdj3pqd6/lTVy/o7SmZ+qlrilFJ063K+V5nbHZOMpoT/fR+/Msf7/eea56dIijkr2Uc osRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAM4qsG0eAgAA On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:13:09 -0400 rj wrote: > On Thu 03 at 12:05 AM -0400, rj wrote: > > > So, what is the source of the appearance of the "9600" speed indicator .. > > These speeds apparently apply only to serial connections which was how most > terminals used to connect. (Sorry, has little to do with zsh.) There's one remaining effect of this in the shell that I can see (there used to be more): it appears still to be using it to decide whether it's worth trying to update the terminal when waiting for a key press. The lower the speed, the longer it will wait before performing a refresh if you don't type anything, up to a maximum of half a second. I suspect there's more going on, so that it's not that simple --- there are other occasions when terminal refreshes happen. pws