Re: Several PCRE module oddities

[Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>]

On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:14:21 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19,  3:21pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> }
> } See the first and third hunks of the patch below, though I suppose we
> } should get general agreement on whether it should work this way, because
> } there's no way to turn it off on a per-pattern basis (unlike turning it
> } *on* with "pcre_compile -i").
> 
> Upon reflection I think NO_CASE_MATCH should apply to =~ but not to
> pcre_compile, because the latter has the -i option.  (Thus discard the
> first hunk of the patch from users/18966.)

Yes, that sounds right.  NO_CASE_MATCH is for the normal RE match
operator, whatever happens to implement it.

pws