From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-19137-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16958 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2014 14:53:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 19137
Received: (qmail 20161 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 14:53:40 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7f776d000003e54-df-5421871738b4
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:43:34 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: rsync --progress stops completion
Message-id: <20140923154334.170bf415@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <11014.1411482228@thecus.kiddle.eu>
References: <lv9jav$8l6$1@ger.gmane.org> <2002755.9ryFYYVtTN@note>
 <5418786F.8030001@thregr.org> <140916175124.ZM5742@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <54194198.2010607@thregr.org> <140917085133.ZM6725@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <541AA918.8060503@thregr.org> <140918093602.ZM7963@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <lvjuvl$mru$1@ger.gmane.org> <11014.1411482228@thecus.kiddle.eu>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4VV3xdsUQgzkzJC12nFzJ6MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujMMfnzIWzGGpmLC4m62BcRNzFyMnh4SAicSt3ussELaYxIV7
	69m6GLk4hASWMkq83LGZHcphkmjp/Q+U4eBgEVCVeLA4G6SBTcBQYuqm2YwgtoiAqMTyFSD1
	nBzCAnoSc7Z+ZwWxeQXsJXYtvQC2jFPAQGLCzbdsILaQwBsmiV39lSA2v4C+xNW/n5ggjrCX
	mHnlDCNEr6DEj8n3wI5jFtCS2LytiRXClpfYvOYt8wRGgVlIymYhKZuFpGwBI/MqRtHU0uSC
	4qT0XCO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjJAQ/LqDcekxq0OMAhyMSjy8HmsUQoRYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ
	8D6oUgwR4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwFi17I1CYHHP72XpIhXyf7/ktexWW/Zq89KN
	/xgbvK/6lLHfleCLX3bd1T7x3cWKxr5CN7NJwokBcS+WxLe7blJisGC20W4WOm34y2HFwk3a
	AlNPxzUfe/A68YpViqV0+wPB7tv6zd+KBTa6Oxt/KFfrONi8zP3P+zVOXn05VXMiuObdWn2Z
	Q4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRAH7OozUfAgAA

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:23:48 +0200
Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> For the original example with -P/--progress, I find it to be a useful
> feature that they are mutually exclusive. Completion is more useful with
> fewer matches and the lack of matches can be a good indication that
> you've made a mistake or are doing something pointless.

Yeah, I think the only sensible change here is an option to say accept
but don't offer, as Bart mentioned.  Which is probably possible but it's
down in comparguments...

pws