From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6757 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 09:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19139 Received: (qmail 25164 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2014 09:49:27 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7f776d000003e54-26-542293a3d7e3 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:49:22 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-user Subject: Re: append mark qualifier disturbs sort qualifier? Message-id: <20140924104922.01ee66a4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20140924092404.GB3248@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140924092404.GB3248@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Zd3Fk5VCDPb9N7TYcXIlowOjx6qD H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MnbeWctScJ+54lRrG1MD4w+mLkZODgkBE4lT3VfYIGwxiQv3 1gPZXBxCAksZJf40/WSBcpgk/vV/YgSpYhFQlTj15BAziM0mYCgxddNssLiIgIJE05HFrCC2 sIC1RO/FXnYQm1fAXmL9kjawGk4BK4mPy+eDbRMSsJSY/W8GWJxfQF/i6t9PUBfZS8y8coYR oldQ4sfkeywgNrOAlsTmbU2sELa8xOY1b5knMArMQlI2C0nZLCRlCxiZVzGKppYmFxQnpeca 6RUn5haX5qXrJefnbmKEBOHXHYxLj1kdYhTgYFTi4Z0orhQixJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYT3VQ9Q iDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4ECMTB6dUA6PnNrsr/7ll1na1TuzUPnPkbsLU0+4Tvu3KtjexfVZ1 jsPQWcLD1mRe/lWHzLs7Zzy4Xiz97Wh1gqXsTQ6X4waLl9se+cpvWP4tZErS9U2yrEdE/m30 f7Oy0ClU7IGLCKPr66u3uBxWZf2slz2tLi2s9qBIIz3xT9H2g09NUtpSPVSWqz+cs0eJpTgj 0VCLuag4EQByY+dzIAIAAA== On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:24:04 +0800 Han Pingtian wrote: > localhost% print -l **/*(odonT) > 2/3/4/ > 2/3/4/5.txt > 2/3/4/6.txt > 2/ > 2/3/ > > Here, looks like "(T)" disturbs the sorting of "(odon)"? I've reproduced this but haven't looked in detail yet. It looks vaguely like the extra / is confusing it into thinking 2/3/4/ is an empty file in the directory 2/3/4. However, that doesn't explain why 2/ comes before 2/3/. pws