From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25731 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2015 16:38:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19823 Received: (qmail 11744 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2015 16:38:38 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-b4-54d39bf78d0f Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:38:28 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATH variable case-insensitive? Message-id: <20150205163828.31617aec@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <54D39290.9020702@gmail.com> References: <54D39290.9020702@gmail.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7rfZ18OMVi9VtRix8mVjA6MHqsO fmAKYIzisklJzcksSy3St0vgynjfdJitYBNrxdKn+9kbGBeydDFyckgImEjMOD6NFcIWk7hw bz1bFyMXh5DAUkaJM0ePM4MkhAQWMUk0Pq+BSGxjlFh5dRNQFQcHi4CqxJJNCiA1bAKGElM3 zWYEsUUERCWWr9jMDmILC+hIrH2/jA3E5hWwl5jw8DWYzSmgKdE1pRVqvobE7eNPmUBsfgF9 iat/PzFBHGQvMfPKGUaIXkGJH5PvgR3NLKAlsXlbEyuELS+xec1bqDnqEjfu7mafwCg0C0nL LCQts5C0LGBkXsUomlqaXFCclJ5rpFecmFtcmpeul5yfu4kRErJfdzAuPWZ1iFGAg1GJh/eG 1+UQIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8d5qBQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxiZODilGhjL/rgvbN3qescg c4r/hsWzxS7Mviihvb5nitfN4ODgw46T3eKdlyyY2WT8bGrTP01Rq2Uf1j4yf1Aa1VbtItOQ YWirFTXD+fjryFvLJ8zOPOZQkvLcubGS9fpRizca4cltH18UBokuDl4akdS9jmHy5H7LK2eW NL/dPdF77+8Pe69qXl7ovfCBEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAYPWRXjcCAAA= On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:56:00 +0100 Koch wrote: > Using zsh 5.0.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) with the following file contents in > ./test.zsh: > > PATH=bar > path=omg > echo $PATH > > and running zsh ./test.zsh outputs: > omg > > Is this a bug? It's certainly not my intention to have this meaning > attached to this program, since it goes against POSIX. In addition to what Kurtis said, if you're expecting zsh run in the default fashion to be strictly POSIX-compatible, you're in for a *lot* of surprises. There are ways of making it so but generally speaking unless you're comfortable with zsh's own way of doing things, bash is your friend. pws