From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4570 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2015 09:47:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 20021 Received: (qmail 3666 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2015 09:47:36 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=0SZSxX9FQ2RxPuzwrsWafwJ5E7Y=; b=S51FPi9FaLfxEBOl8BAva 0oIgs6DAAdPt7o4kiLDp2I7IHOcv6CRC/n1YZ+F3RXk7YMQAkI/SwweFuBn9UaCQ XP94al17M7pvAgbzXTl3sG5SXi7kLp4o67WfvArYSB1HjoeiTYj20PjF7pXA1/v+ OWrezvixGt8GJGI5Ne9yrc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s= smtpout; bh=0SZSxX9FQ2RxPuzwrsWafwJ5E7Y=; b=qU/ZFBNFIJnCemSJS/pt 2zfPQDonbnP419tvgfDSHXG5rIpj5GY9uG20eunDkKXJSN0Nbu7ef/OLVE+F0d/z xhyWq+PqPe/yydv+zRTr9Jtzft2LWfw+XRvOAYajGSWWJksCyeMwhsLY7FyjpwUW WLG1em74B9G7q/T/V6iRABI= X-Sasl-enc: aT/4IF3PybckmAgoro1guqrwak+82wwYqp+l5tFQxl8l 1426498586 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:36:24 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: patches format Re: fndir introspection, site-packages documentation Message-ID: <20150316093623.GG1875@tarsus.local2> References: <20150313224121.GO4524@isis.sigpipe.cz> <150313203904.ZM25016@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150315021436.GQ4524@isis.sigpipe.cz> <150315121447.ZM27996@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <150315121447.ZM27996@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:14:47 -0700: > Aside: I don't suppose there's any point in again begging people to stop > attaching patches as "text/x-patch" or "text/x-diff" or other silly MIME > types that half my email clients say there is no app for, and the other > half pass to some miscelleneous (wrong) app because of the ".patch" file > extension, which someone seems to think has something to do with setting > up network tunnels. > > Grumble. Text bleeping plain, or just put them in the message body. > I wouldn't advise people to put patches in the body, since most mail clients auto-wrap and strip leading/trailing whtiespace by default (which corrupts empty context lines). Instead, I usually advise people to attach patches as a file named *.txt. That filename pattern usually results in text/plain attachments. > I suppose I should also rant about email client authors who don't have > a "text/*" fallback. Rant rant. We now return you to your regularly > scheduled curmudgeonry.