From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20068-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 20303 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2015 17:00:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20068
Received: (qmail 4694 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2015 17:00:52 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-88-551d7513ae7b
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:00:44 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: device cannot be completed after "ip link show dev"
Message-id: <20150402180044.61061220@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <150402095547.ZM12496@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <20150330033930.GB2856@localhost.localdomain>
 <20150331195701.4bc78e7c@ntlworld.com>
 <20150401100718.GB2805@localhost.localdomain>
 <20150401131525.69d06918@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <150401084744.ZM30889@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20150402080307.GD2805@localhost.localdomain>
 <150402095547.ZM12496@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7rCpbKhBh82mFjsOLmS0YHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGZdXvGEs2M5U0fAqpoHxH2MXIyeHhICJxJ3zv9khbDGJC/fW
	s3UxcnEICSxllHj1bC0zhLOISaLvxGcmCGcbo8S+WVeZQFpYBFQl+uc1sIHYbAKGElM3zQYb
	KyIgKrF8xWawscICDhLrfr4Bi/MK2EssP9fJAmJzClhJbHw2ix1i6A0miVMfdzCDJPgF9CWu
	/v3EBHGTvcTMK2egmgUlfky+B9bMLKAlsXlbEyuELS+xec1bsF4hAXWJG3d3s09gFJqFpGUW
	kpZZSFoWMDKvYhRNLU0uKE5KzzXSK07MLS7NS9dLzs/dxAgJ2687GJceszrEKMDBqMTD22At
	EyrEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhFcrTTZUiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4ECMTB6dUA6OXaLPBnTd8N/bM
	cNqt9EBvoka4j+T33WLVcrduGVzv2dE/mfdmZ5xSbf4/1XOpZxwCuLN+zvn+euHkZBvP41wy
	Lw1Z3TR+nGIyf3LfdZP7iZO7wjzXbZ/dxJb8L7f+rJVgsJ7F4S1/OTaHveY/8SRt9sXF4tv8
	nojr/bkTEFnldqhD4/H9/S1KLMUZiYZazEXFiQCm4BOfOQIAAA==

On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:55:47 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> We're wandering into "is the result worth the effort?" territory, so it
> may be that $words[CURRENT-1] is the best compromise.

That's my current feeling, barring the infinite number of developer
monkeys thing.

pws