From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20155-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 26896 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 17:46:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20155
Received: (qmail 28268 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2015 17:46:50 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:36:28 +0200
From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
To: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: `[[ -n $VAR ]]` equal to `[[ $VAR ]]`?
Message-ID: <20150413173628.GO95632@isis.sigpipe.cz>
References: <mg78mg$vqb$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CABx2=D-VTpp3ihAE_A2KCdE3tcPu5RPuB8WJwtv-G=B0QNx0GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <mg79kr$vqb$2@ger.gmane.org>
 <CABx2=D9Mk01ovQkMyWT_1nh9WdDvcpqmMJAOdka-oEmN8Xe4nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABx2=D93rJDoqGHa=9=nGZZU=9oC_vc-0FHE8ZERV9LmxtqRaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHYJk3Qj6W=VZ26si0VjhsmS1u9go6mVGpXjDSTLk5knKaEtOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABx2=D-Nki9-v1udVT=dbJ5pk9dD_P=aMDkT9=GKZ675sSYFGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <mg7p91$7mp$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <552BF451.4080701@eastlink.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <552BF451.4080701@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

# rayandrews@eastlink.ca / 2015-04-13 09:52:33 -0700:
> My two cents is that each has it's place.  If I'm replying to an email 
> in the most 'general' way--something like "Ok, thanks."--I top post,

what's the point of sending back the whole thing in such a situation?

-- 
roman