From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20457-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 24832 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2015 08:31:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20457
Received: (qmail 23486 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2015 08:31:54 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=pmxXAFvO69uUBQnuRZKI7j1+4co=; b=Pbu7Jz
	BkJRnMEYjt0AX0K3uqMIO4dhITjhuJqS99IDGTXgz50np0NWx8Je8DH9CzNkXcuh
	ki9f7NUqDDboIAf00bYITwH/4m7rysEBqB9vDGco1p9YoMjPUtRgfX46oIyXt4Wg
	TSplfzFsbmvH/RPc+O02xQtR46y9krk5eeBvc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=pmxXAFvO69uUBQnuRZKI7j1+4co=; b=W9yur
	n0DscuDcO8zb8ifV3GnuGx/hiDu68ONFo/1vngocdx1GliT67jt1QwPYq3SsyjYI
	LXipNphFS3vvTardKJCVGcUrO/CrZpT035Ibav6vJGsC3Kt0U+jj/b7eHA8poCh/
	7lXKaiJ9e50IdZfbrTKZWm0glpV1XxsL6WZmPc=
X-Sasl-enc: TKFkJAgN6xuatDFmzXMyULT9s5mQ35/C+jL9MR2ROHI+ 1440318712
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:31:46 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Cc: phy1729@gmail.com, zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.8-test-2
Message-ID: <20150823083146.GA7537@tarsus.local2>
References: <20150821215037.6b010cf7@ntlworld.com>
 <CAGnh9tBv_-2ddZWCCqfO+9myfMXFMm3k+To=1M43P8W_00+sAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9306B4F4-68C3-4EC5-93FD-A40346692465@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9306B4F4-68C3-4EC5-93FD-A40346692465@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Jun T. wrote on Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 20:48:47 +0900:
> -#ifdef USE_DEV_PTMX
> +#if defined(USE_DEV_PTMX) && !defined(__OpenBSD__)

Wouldn't it be better to change configure to avoid defining the macro in
the first place on OpenBSD?  This would matter if more uses of
USE_DEV_PTMX in C file are added: the knowledge that "don't USE_DEV_PTMX
on OpenBSD" should be consolidated in one place.

IIRC $OSTYPE is the variable to test.