From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20989-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 14164 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:00:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20989
Received: (qmail 29123 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2015 10:00:43 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f79b16d000005389-ba-565586c78d18
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:00:36 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TmfDtA==?= Huy <huynhok.uit@vnoss.org>,
 Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Cc: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Zsh bug] function define bug
Message-id: <20151125100036.69e8ec60@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CAPO9ZdqXvxmO8ykzNGCs9Piov+pgHaJCchiF_BeQ+kD8z2yRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAPO9ZdrRL9e+B4urS4S5EitsOqjQYYji6F13JWkmOwLA=FyEbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGnh9tB8oEua8npLmkhbPPBvMq1C3wfusnTo0MzLx0RjAiGaHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPO9Zdp4eHtM3n0GrP0TE2b9-u=6eWXYzrZg6w4BtbTL7644zA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALS7p_cNO6=ZVnU9Zw_4exY+DWZxjEXQ=SOwU3O2fwDmq7Jmfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPO9ZdrV2HORspz=H+rN=A5uT0w=3CbxQpB0PrKxXLWGgPg4XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALS7p_eigQakWkp0ryELD=7kUiGCzyRbbi6iq1NhChjANGRqVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPO9ZdqXvxmO8ykzNGCs9Piov+pgHaJCchiF_BeQ+kD8z2yRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7rH20LDDDYtkLCYtGMJs8WMSTdZ
	LXacXMnowOyxc9Zddo9FE3tYPFYd/MAUwBzFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlXF5+mX2guPMFTPmhTQw
	vmLqYuTkkBAwkehfsZ4dwhaTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMBSRonWqQcZIZwGJokbd95DZc4xSsza9Y8V
	wjnLKPHk90xWkH4WAVWJ7qev2UBsNgFDiambZjOC2CICoRKbrpxjAbGZBXQlWm63gO0TFtCS
	uH/zKdgdvAL2EgePrQCr4RQIlljatBVq9R9miQlTH4EV8QvoS1z9+wnqcHuJmVfOMEI0C0r8
	mHwPaoGWxOZtTawQtrzE5jVvmUFsIQF1iRt3d7NPYBSZhaRlFpKWWUhaFjAyr2IUTS1NLihO
	Ss810itOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQIiYivOxiXHrM6xCjAwajEw/viSUiYEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHe
	37WhYUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5Z+56HyIkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgZNUp
	9nO/sV1y7vfNj11uyAQfO2X4ay5XtF/7z58n/Vg8oxzui0yYnCXxu8aprmxdlJuU+UvOeSo/
	/y2dwLiZc8eRczVmulFn/jT7Jk6/yfWgwNGp94leuLtocQ5njNF+v4A4Ma4s3VhFD74vX1Y2
	7PtrJxnoEDlBu3Drib+vdzKtEMg4XzNHiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA6WCzo4QCAAA=

The MULTI_FUNC_DEF behaviour was there in the shell from the start (and
didn't used to be optional) --- I think it was there mostly for defining
multiple trap functions in one go.  That's about the only standard use,
anyway (there was one instance in the completion code until we removed
it).

Feel absolutely free to turn it otf yourself, but please can we stop the
yes we should / no we shouldn't unless you have new information.

Thanks
pws