From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1800 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2016 22:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 21627 Received: (qmail 3433 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2016 22:53:29 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:53:25 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Sebastian Gniazdowski Cc: Zsh Users Subject: Re: Are completions in some way heavy? Message-ID: <20160607225325.GB22258@tarsus.local2> References: <160606090104.ZM11947__15732.477248139$1465228961$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <160606090104.ZM11947__15732.477248139$1465228961$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Bart Schaefer wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:01:04 -0700: > On Jun 6, 2:43pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > } Also, overall, it would be nice that I would collect all mainstream _* > } patches, and provide the completions for all Zsh versions. > > Having a location from which to grab .../share/$ZSH_VERSION/functions/ > trees for past zsh releases would be useful, particularly if fixes from > more recent versions were backported when possible. Sebastian, your project currently only covers completion functions (Completion/**/*), not runtime functions (Functions/**/*); do you plan to cover the latter too? The "most fixes made in master are applicable to older versions too" point applies to non-completion functions too, after all. Cheers, Daniel