From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-21729-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18024 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2016 04:58:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 21729
Received: (qmail 590 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2016 04:58:04 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 04:57:58 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: ${(k)widgets} v. 'zle -la'
Message-ID: <20160705045758.GA18441@tarsus.local2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

$ zsh -f
% bindkey zzzzzz foobar
% zle -la | grep foobar                   
% print -rl -- ${(k)widgets} | grep foobar 
foobar
% 

Is it intentional that 'foobar' is listed by 'zle -la' but not by
${(k)widgets}?  I'd expected those two to enumerate the same set of
widgets.

Observations:

- The manual speaks of "all existing widgets" for the former and of "all
  defined widgets" for the latter.

- The thingy has the 'DISABLED' flag:

  (gdb) p *(Thingy)thingytab->getnode2(thingytab, "foobar") 
  $1 = {next = 0x7ffff5e73688 <thingies+5640>, nam = 0x6fb210 "foobar", flags = 1, rc = 1, widget = 0x0, samew = 0x0}