From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12397 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2016 09:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 21788 Received: (qmail 9717 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2016 09:29:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.13):SA:0(-1.3/5.0):. Processed in 0.146926 secs); 21 Jul 2016 09:29:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f792a6d000001302-0f-579093b4a79c Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:19:45 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Next release (5.3) Message-id: <20160721101945.35cb2193@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20160721054019.GA3821@tarsus.local2> References: <20160712075849.GG1537@isis.sigpipe.cz> <160712094017.ZM17395@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160720130512.GA20398@zira.vinc17.org> <20160720140006.GA28704@zira.vinc17.org> <20160720151517.6a833f2c__37436.2382958227$1469024822$gmane$org@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20160721054019.GA3821@tarsus.local2> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7pbJk8INzj7VNVix8mVjA6MHqsO fmAKYIzisklJzcksSy3St0vgyvhyyrHgBWvFqk3nmRsYj7J0MXJySAiYSDxdd5kVwhaTuHBv PVsXIxeHkMBSRomp31ZDOdOYJFbsW8cM4ZxjlJiwYQ0LhHOWUWJGSzdQhoODRUBVYtdUP5BR bAKGElM3zWYEsUUERCWWr9jMDmILC8hL9LdeYwOxeQXsJdp/zwKzOQWMJC7sn8gIMXMfk0Tb py4mkAS/gL7E1b+fmCDus5eYeeUMI0SzoMSPyffAfmAW0JLYvK2JFcKWl9i85i0ziC0koC5x 4+5u9gmMwrOQtMxC0jILScsCRuZVjKKppckFxUnpuUZ6xYm5xaV56XrJ+bmbGCHh/HUH49Jj VocYBTgYlXh4d6zuDxdiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwvu/ZUK4EG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYl cd6Zu96HCAmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhiXSqRuUjvBezYxx8dDWWnD6/msWcVxzVF5dw5s aZ0sfjX/aWKqeuSD3WF2fjWrfVQbUuIuT1vo+rbp177DjZlCAbITIwon1fStMPz8/anf0dRJ 1voSbiUPm6StZtyU0LzXfmLhlBPLG/k2v3qVeKa+zDbaLOLgdD77oO7EO8+Ta6xT/Qxqziux FGckGmoxFxUnAgC40xCkYwIAAA== On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:40:19 +0000 Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Peter Stephenson wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 15:15:17 +0100: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:00:06 +0200 > > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > But it does not say how ".." is resolved. > > > > Yes, we should be clear it's the way zsh has done it with the default > > option settings for directories in the past. > > This patch conflicts with my 21779 [I did not push immediately after > posting to allow for feedback]. Yes, Bart pointed that out. > I think both of them make sense: 21779 specifies the behaviour in > absolute terms and 21784 provides the "this is the algorithm 'cd' uses" > information. I can wait. pws