From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22333 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2016 05:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 21857 Received: (qmail 24729 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2016 05:37:03 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.28):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.508585 secs); 09 Sep 2016 05:37:03 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=rAtw2P9Qe61A55Bv2cyBRqYTyqE=; b=MkBotN PJfx5QMTepku9ru1AfX8UiC8cTdAth2bGxKoZcR4/MW9ImF0u2hatY0ClUsvkMi5 bmFY8nwdwZTPMj6UjTcxI7cnMXYjaFYqQ2rVSoTyDVXQNVlgdvebxWDzJ3l2rXyi e4Ju+1Ow0/GSwBNAfPpDwn2ZSAuI/oIeriSl0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=rAtw2P9Qe61A55Bv2cyBRqYTyqE=; b=KN2TQ Lb0a4zNjDVGun7l6ZelsJqfqYifm96FR/Kv3b5tCifiONAQ6tI6kVqj/nswp62Ro U3l5dIhvRnPwaPOMrjt17An41zdo7UF7968ohKXC59qQFXVeuBB5pQevpAiQZN5f Ze0h0JbHPQifg3Tn3YU+IS2khHBcgpuS/evUhc= X-Sasl-enc: 85bczOyi3aYZEkbLJq3Y1Dv03ZC9AdyekDw6ygBsnWr9 1473399413 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 05:36:09 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Zsh Users Subject: Re: Fastest way to count # of files? Message-ID: <20160909053609.GA7401@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> References: <160908090800.ZM13466@torch.brasslantern.com> <160908180958.ZM14692__14483.1264777624$1473385001$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <160908180958.ZM14692__14483.1264777624$1473385001$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Bart Schaefer wrote on Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 18:09:58 -0700: > On Sep 8, 1:00pm, Bart Schaefer wrote: > } > } This assumes that nlink for a directory is the number of files it > } contains plus "." and "..". > > Accuracy of this seems to vary by filesystem type, so probably not > a viable solution. nlink for a directory $d is usually the two plus number of subdirectories $d has; it's unrelated to the number of files in $d. (A directory is hard linked from its parent, from itself, and from each subdirectory of itself, but not from files in it.)