From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-23304-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10142 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2018 00:01:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-users-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 23304
Received: (qmail 29579 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Apr 2018 18:10:40 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.29):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 15.093606 secs); 04 Apr 2018 18:10:40 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
	:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=GezxZS5Cd0ZjdIO0ngBeCTE6ko8CR
	EIzTXjpCR3tqiM=; b=BvYCUIMb1kakRVB8b3mLVmESrR6IQugVwmJv0p0I5vc2R
	WrKgw/IlXUBKE0V8Q9Icl/XyJkKCI/9tnsCDnrQ+Lmy8xqX0tWwqNeLXVqOoiIZx
	C5kRgAvuQwVQjZ5UhXgarAzms+8FUNEBzVqXtteILdRWc0UZKrGp96Q12oFdoBN3
	tt4xULxeC7rQ8+qiqH8vGu+w05UYP8iJ5RGjAmkgkzHFLuyhEUDna60ggivT8lY5
	JnY6Qp6R5wQuIUGl8v8F5ZJzEW2YYgR8u2MhZ4OCbfo3IVBQNkvRt/XauFAFfxJV
	ONCtjft25pOjvsyhKiD683CD7zIN/+B8h74OQQ5Ow==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
	:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=GezxZS5Cd0ZjdIO0ngBeCTE6ko8CR
	EIzTXjpCR3tqiM=; b=IzKX4OyzAYy4Htt3zycU2IQHL/lvVCXghhWKnNwe6cd0/
	EvD1Hj3dLL/89go2n0NzZA8uyXeCqKFiujYVyQS7RJfCN6+ran4h/YFPF9vQWv1r
	oVTUrBwOxqJpF8nArqHeutpvDfWc45V8yya4f5D3+3oO/NY3jPgOZxGinfiqmev9
	79bQeG2Lwe/805sN7hXgVPxJPYeS98cOl+3788JBHuFVOChhvETxjTl1sVtjklPO
	/jSSo3BIO9I2y1TUCq2EOcC2BmJhnCxScdOsP80PHAXNFI4Xg6j2gmMFXPBjTS0V
	cc5bIonp9GTKiW5imAiX5ckcP5l2k+V36QvAkeR/Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ChXFWrxMb-jJVpyBGHye_TEj5W4chYq-4sc16E-gkCG-jTifHEnyKg>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:10:17 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: whence (was Re: local unfunction)
Message-ID: <20180404181017.lcz74c4tyojz77ao@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
References: <CAH+w=7Zz4HMfB_RA5nHr_i_iwKvD=S0QOjcogc0Y0OYSXv0JXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6935145d-785f-f2dd-d4f2-e7ea627e2bc3@eastlink.ca>
 <CAH+w=7ane3_cT75hyZYp_4Zd1aT1eeDbbW9CVpBTZjAhKFQ+Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522604036.2902094.1322956328.767274EF@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <CAH+w=7YL7S-+QQD0-kLEFh=FFgLBSriEyHzbtL9cjqq_9u1U4Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH+w=7YL7S-+QQD0-kLEFh=FFgLBSriEyHzbtL9cjqq_9u1U4Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:17:40 -0700:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >
> > So, -m can lie if 'rehash' hasn't been run since $PATH was last changed?
> 
> It forces a cmdnamtab->filltable() before scanning, so I think not.

Let me rephrase.  In your example:

> > > % path=(./Src $path)
> > > % whence zsh
> > > ./Src/zsh
> > > % whence -a zsh
> > > ./Src/zsh
> > > /bin/zsh
> > > % whence -m zsh
> > > /bin/zsh
> > > %

why do 'whence' and 'whence -m' give different results?  Isn't one or the other
wrong?