From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a8857b75 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23949 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2019 22:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 24399 Received: (qmail 28219 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Nov 2019 22:13:18 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from 8.smtp.34sp.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.102.0/25622. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(46.183.8.243):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.266118 secs); 04 Nov 2019 22:13:18 -0000 X-Envelope-From: dave@tty1.uk X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at tty1.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:09:41 +0000 From: Dave Woodfall To: Zsh Users Subject: rxvt completion Message-ID: <20191104220941.GC28517@blackswan> Mail-Followup-To: Zsh Users MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Authenticated-As: dave@unrealize.co.uk X-OriginalSMTPIP: 82.40.94.2 X-34spcom-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-34spcom-MailScanner-ID: 453E7EDC1.A32C4 X-34spcom-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-34spcom-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-10, required 6.5, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00, X34SP_OVERRIDE -10.00) X-34spcom-MailScanner-From: dave@tty1.uk Hi, I'm using zsh 5.6.2 on Slackware. I noticed today while using rxvt, that the urxvt completion function also includes rxvt: /usr/share/zsh/5.6.2/functions/_urxvt: #compdef rxvt urxvt urxvtc urxvt256c urxvt256cc urxvt256c-ml rxvt256c-mlc The rxvt I have is: Rxvt v2.7.10 - released: 26 MARCH 2003 And the options are different to urxvt, so using them give errors. If I submit a patch for rxvt completion, would it be accepted, as it would mean removing rxvt from _urxvt's compdef? I'm guessing that some *nixes out there rename urxvt to rxvt? Or is there a completer for rxvt out there already? Cheers /dw