From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17608 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 15:36:57 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 15:36:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 74896 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 15:36:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 15:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4006 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2005 15:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8932 Received: (qmail 3997 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 15:36:42 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 15:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 73793 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 15:36:42 -0000 Received: from mailhost1.csr.com (HELO MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com) (81.105.217.43) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 15:36:39 -0000 Received: from exchange03.csr.com (unverified [10.100.137.60]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:34:48 +0100 Received: from csr.com ([10.102.144.127]) by exchange03.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:38:38 +0100 To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: named pipes blocking zsh In-reply-to: References: <1050601144728.ZM11059@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Tim K. (Gmane)" message dated "Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:20:00 -0700." Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:36:38 +0100 Message-ID: <22812.1117640198@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2005 15:38:38.0893 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB2FD5D0:01C566BF] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 "Tim K. (Gmane)" wrote: > What's interesting is that if I 'strace' the zsh process while it's > stuck (after the pipe was deleted), it will terminate. I'm not sure what > the explanation behind it is ... Presumably to be able to trace the system call there is a different pathway through the open() call. pws ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************