From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5460 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 17:10:32 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 17:10:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 16527 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 17:10:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5854 Received: (qmail 16515 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 17:10:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 17:10:03 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [195.212.29.4] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 17:10:3 -0000 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-4.uk.ibm.COM (1.0.0) with ESMTP id QAA165000 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:49:14 GMT Received: from koetsu.uk.ibm.com (lig32-239-169-139.emea.lig-dial.ibm.com [32.239.169.139]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id h0VHA0HS050784 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:10:02 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koetsu.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152AD399AD for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koetsu.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6042E524 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:33:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3E3A972C.5000503@uk.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:33:00 +0000 From: Cosmo Organization: IBM Informix User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'zsh users'" Subject: Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@ References: <86hec1hwo2.fsf@karthy.karthy.net> <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B62C@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> <20030131114905.GP896@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030131114905.GP896@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8 'Roman Neuhauser' wrote: > # Andrey.Borzenkov@siemens.com / 2003-01-31 09:40:24 +0300: >>the spam volume has decreased but it is still there. Lists known to me that >>do use confirmation do not have spam at all. Some other high-volume lists >>(lkml as the very good example) have much better signal to noise ratio >>comparing with zsh lists. > > > I think it is obvious now that MessageWall (or whatever it was that > sunsite.dk people installed) doesn't do its work as it should. Can > we please settle on qconfirm? Yup, gets my vote. Cosmo