From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA07452 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 16:53:30 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA10506; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 00:44:22 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 00:37:55 -0500 (EST) To: Geoff Wing cc: rag@asicint.com (Richard A. Guay), zsh-users@math.gatech.edu, johnb@barfly.mcom.com Subject: Re: Editing History under Zsh 3.0.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Nov 1996 13:59:36 +1100." <199611220259.NAA11110@coral.primenet.com.au> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 14:38:08 +0900 Message-ID: <471.848900288@aa.cs.keio.ac.jp> From: Yuichiro Shibata Resent-Message-ID: <"E7FWa1.0.OY2.o2Jco"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/524 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I tried the patches, but still I'm in face of the same problem under SunOS4.1.4 and Solaris2.4. Should I wait for 3.0.2? >Richard A. Guay wrote: >:I have noticed that the latest version of zsh, 3.0.1, goes a >:little crazy if you for previous command and then >:use and edit the beginning of the line. It will put multiple >:characters sometimes (not always reproducable, but most of the >:time.). The longer the previous line was, the worse the result. Geoff Wing worte: >I sent some patches in for this and hopefully your problem has been fixed. >You can either wait for 3.0.2 (or 3.1) to come out, get the patch from >the ftp sites called "testing/zsh-3.1.0-test3.diff.gz" and only patch the file >zle_refresh.c unless you want the whole test(!) `upgrade', or I can email the >patch to you. -------- Yuichiro Shibata (shibata@aa.cs.keio.ac.jp) Dept. of Computer Science, Keio Univ.