Re: Auto-correct and newly-added commands

["Daniel Serodio (lists)" <daniel.lists@mandic.com.br>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Nov 18, 10:50am, Daniel Serodio wrote:
> } Subject: Re: Auto-correct and newly-added commands
> }
> } Bart Schaefer wrote:
> }>  On Nov 14,  4:31pm, Daniel Serodio (lists) wrote:
> }>  }
> }>  } It it possible to have zsh automatically run "rehash" after I reply no
> }>  } to an auto-correct prompt, so it "learns" this new command?
> }>
> }>  That would certainly seem logical.  Also it seems strange to load up
> }>  the command tables and check them for proper spellings when the word
> }>  that is being checked is not in the command position to begin with.
> } Hmm, maybe my explanation wasn't clear (or I don't understand your
> } reply), but I only have problem with real commands (in the beginning of
> } the line), not with their arguments. Or did you mention "words not in
> } the command position" from reviewing the code and not my explanation?
>
> The latter (that's the first hunk of the patch).
>
> }>  What this patch does is reset the incremental path search in the event
> }>  the correction is rejected.  That allows whatever hashing options the
> }>  user has specified to kick in at the time the path is searched during
> }>  command execution, rather than having to test them all here.
> } This sounds like what I need, but when I tried to apply this patch, it
> } failed (both on zsh 4.3.12 and on a fresh git clone).
>
> I'm not sure why it would have failed on 4.3.12, but it's already been
> committed to sourceforge CVS so a fresh git of the very latest probably
> won't need to have it applied.
>
> What was the failure message from patch?  Did you use "patch -p0" ?
I used patch -p0 on zsh-4.3.12 sources root directory:

patching file Src/utils.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2498.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2623.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Src/utils.c.rej
>
> } Where should I apply this patch?
>
> For your purposes you only need the second hunk with two lines added.
> Try manually deleting the first hunk and then applying the second:
I've applied this hunk by manually typing and it works like a charm.

Thanks a lot,
Daniel Serodio